AES
UtilitiesAES Corporation
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2011–2025(15yr)| Metric | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.3B | $18.1B | $15.9B | $17.1B | $15.0B | $13.6B | $10.5B | $10.7B | $10.2B | $9.7B | $11.1B | $12.6B | $12.7B | $12.3B | $12.2B | -0.4% |
| Gross Profit | $4.1B | $3.7B | $3.2B | $3.1B | $2.9B | $2.4B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $2.3B | $2.7B | $2.7B | $2.5B | $2.5B | $2.3B | $2.2B | -4.5% |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 20.5% | 20.4% | 18.0% | 19.2% | 17.9% | 23.4% | 24.0% | 23.1% | 27.9% | 24.3% | 20.2% | 19.8% | 18.8% | 18.1% | -0.8pp |
| Net Income | $58.0M | -$912.0M | $114.0M | $769.0M | $306.0M | -$1.1B | -$1.2B | $1.2B | $303.0M | $46.0M | -$409.0M | -$546.0M | $249.0M | $1.7B | $910.0M | -45.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -5.0% | 0.7% | 4.5% | 2.0% | -8.3% | -11.0% | 11.2% | 3.0% | 0.5% | -3.7% | -4.3% | 2.0% | 13.7% | 7.4% | -6.2pp |
| Free Cash Flow | $454.0M | $665.0M | $727.0M | -$225.0M | -$174.0M | $539.0M | $312.0M | $222.0M | $61.0M | $855.0M | -$214.0M | -$1.8B | -$4.7B | -$4.6B | -$1.6B | +65.0% |
| FCF Margin | 2.6% | 3.7% | 4.6% | -1.3% | -1.2% | 4.0% | 3.0% | 2.1% | 0.6% | 8.9% | -1.9% | -14.6% | -37.0% | -37.8% | -13.3% | +24.5pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.07 | $-1.21 | $0.15 | $1.06 | $0.44 | $-1.71 | $-1.76 | $1.81 | $0.45 | $0.07 | $-0.61 | $-0.82 | $0.35 | $2.36 | $1.26 | -46.6% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
AES is rebranding itself as a "next-generation" energy partner for the AI era, leveraging its utility locations near fiber networks to attract power-hungry data centers. However, this strategic pivot is being executed from a position of financial weakness, as AES Corporation currently pairs the highest dividend yield in its peer group with the deepest negative free cash flow.
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
AES Corporation’s primary competitive advantage—its "deep relationships with technology companies" and a 4 GW backlog of hyperscaler contracts (8-K)—is directly threatened by its $30 billion debt load (XBRL). High indebtedness limits the financial flexibility needed to deliver complex projects "on time and on budget," especially if interest rate volatility increases the cost of refinancing (10-K Item 1A). Furthermore, the "Green Blend" strategy and the 46 GW renewables pipeline are highly sensitive to regulatory shifts; any modification to tax credits under the 2025 Act could undermine the economic viability of the very projects AES has already signed (10-K Item 1A).
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
While AES reported a quarterly revenue increase to $3.35 billion in Q3 2025 (10-Q), the broader trajectory remains stagnant with a trailing twelve-month revenue growth of -0.4% (XBRL). This divergence suggests that while new projects like the 3 GW brought online since late 2024 are contributing to the top line, they are barely offsetting declines in other areas, such as the Energy Infrastructure segment which saw a $131 million revenue drop (10-Q).
The most jarring figure is the Free Cash Flow (FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders) margin of -19.5%, the lowest among its peers (XBRL). This negative cash flow reflects the massive capital intensity of the 11.1 GW backlog. While management points to a 50% year-to-date increase in Adjusted EBITDAEBITDAEarnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization — a rough proxy for operating cash profit, stripping out accounting adjustments for the Renewables segment (8-K), the market remains wary; short interest stands at 19.6 million shares, representing 3.2% of the float (Yahoo Finance). This suggests a segment of investors is betting that AES Corporation’s capital-intensive growth will not outpace its mounting obligations.
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At a forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations of 6.0x, AES trades at a massive discount to the peer median of 15.1x (XBRL). According to the market-implied growth analysis, this valuation suggests the market is pricing in only 0.5% long-term growth (CAPM analysis). This low expectation is at odds with management’s 46 GW development pipeline and the 11.1 GW backlog of signed power purchase agreements (8-K).
The valuation gap is likely a "leverage discount." Investors are unwilling to pay a peer-level multiple for a company with $29.4 billion in net debt and a negative FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders margin when competitors like Vistra (VST) are generating positive FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders margins of 8.9% (XBRL). For the 6.0x multiple to be "right," AES Corporation’s massive backlog would essentially have to fail to produce incremental profit. If AES can successfully bring its backlog online and move toward the 2.5% GDP-pace growth rate, the justified multiple could rise toward 13.9x (CAPM analysis).
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Constructive if the FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders margin turns positive or significantly narrows toward the peer median, signaling that the heavy investment phase is yielding cash-generative assets.
- Cautious if the 2025 Act results in specific guidance that reduces the value of renewable energy tax credits, which would directly impair the 46 GW pipeline (10-K Item 1A).
- Cautious if there is any reported delay in the 4 GW of hyperscaler projects, as these "customized solutions" are the cornerstone of AES Corporation's growth narrative.
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: A unique combination of regulated utility land-and-water rights and a massive 46 GW renewable development pipeline specifically tailored for the data center industry.
Bottom Line: AES is a high-leverage infrastructure play that the market is currently pricing as a value trap due to its negative cash flow and massive debt.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Operational Disruptions: AES Corporation faces risks from plant outages, equipment failure, and catastrophic events (e.g., fires, cyber-attacks, or extreme weather) that can impede electricity production and lead to penalties under power sales agreements.
- Indebtedness and Liquidity: With approximately $30 billion in consolidated debt, AES Corporation is vulnerable to interest rate volatility and capital market conditions; failure to refinance or generate sufficient subsidiary distributions could restrict growth and dividend payments.
- Regulatory and Policy Uncertainty: AES Corporation’s renewable energy strategy depends on government incentives; the 2025 Act and potential future tax guidance may reduce economic returns, increase financing costs, or delay project completion.
- Wholesale Market Volatility: AES Corporation is exposed to fluctuating spot market prices for electricity and fuel, which can negatively impact the financial performance of generation assets not covered by long-term contracts.
- Counterparty Credit Risk: AES Corporation relies on long-term contracts with customers and suppliers; the failure of these counterparties to perform—due to insolvency or bankruptcy—could result in revenue shortfalls and breaches of AES Corporation's own debt agreements.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Battery Storage Hazards: AES Corporation’s battery storage operations involve inherent risks of lithium-ion batteries venting smoke or flames, which can cause property damage and operational suspension.
- Holding Company Structure: As a holding company with no material assets other than subsidiary stock, AES Corporation is entirely dependent on the ability of its subsidiaries to distribute cash, which is often restricted by local laws, debt covenants, or foreign currency controls.
- Non-Recourse Debt Defaults: While most debt is non-recourse, defaults at the subsidiary level can still trigger cross-defaults in the Parent Company’s credit facilities if the subsidiary meets certain materiality thresholds.
- Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR): AES Corporation faces significant potential remediation expenses and litigation risks associated with the management of CCR at current and former coal-fired plant sites.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- FERC and NERC Compliance: AES Corporation is subject to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and NERC reliability standards; violations can result in significant civil penalties and criminal fines.
- Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Regulation: AES Corporation’s U.S. businesses emitted approximately 11 million metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent in 2025; future regulations, such as the May 2024 EPA rule for existing electric generating units, could impose substantial compliance costs.
- International Political Risk: A significant portion of revenue is generated in developing countries, exposing AES Corporation to expropriation, currency inconvertibility, and the inability to enforce contracts in local legal systems.
- Tax Legislation: AES Corporation is subject to the 15% corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT) and potential global minimum tax rules (Pillar 2), which could impact effective tax rates and cash payments.
4. Financial Impact Map
Operational Disruptions → Revenue / Operating Income → Potential for liquidated damages, penalties, or termination of power sales agreements. Indebtedness → Cash Flow / Interest Expense → High debt service requirements reduce cash available for dividends, acquisitions, and capital expenditures. Renewable Policy Changes → Net Income / Project Returns → Reduced economic returns on project investments and potential write-offs of capitalized development costs. Wholesale Market Volatility → Operating Margin → Unhedged exposure to spot market prices for fuel and electricity can lead to costs exceeding revenues. Counterparty Credit Risk → Accounts Receivable / Revenue → Potential for bad debt or contract rejection in bankruptcy proceedings, leading to revenue loss.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 10-K | Mar 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| 10-Q | Nov 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| 8-K | Nov 2025 | — |
| 14A | Mar 2025 | — |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
AES to be acquired by BlackRock-led consortium for $15.00 per share in cash
- ▸Acquisition values AES at $10.7B equity and $33.4B enterprise value
- ▸Consortium includes Global Infrastructure Partners, EQT, CalPERS, and Qatar Investment Authority
- ▸Q4 adjusted EPS $0.81, beating consensus estimate of $0.62 by 30.6%
- ▸Q4 total revenue $3.1B, missing consensus estimate of $3.45B by 10.1%
- ▸Deal expected to close in late 2026 or early 2027
AES secures requisite noteholder consents for 2028 notes ahead of pending merger
- ▸Received requisite consents for 5.450% Senior Notes due 2028
- ▸Aggregate consent payment of $2.25M, or $4.90 per $1,000 principal
- ▸Amendments become operative upon consummation of Horizon Parent merger
- ▸Backstop facility commitments reduced by aggregate principal of 2028 notes
- ▸Consent fee payable only upon successful completion of merger
AES secures requisite noteholder consents for 2028 notes ahead of pending merger
- ▸Received requisite consents for 5.450% Senior Notes due 2028
- ▸Aggregate consent payment of $2.25M, or $4.90 per $1,000 principal
- ▸Amendments become operative upon consummation of Horizon Parent merger
- ▸Backstop facility commitments reduced by aggregate principal of 2028 notes
- ▸Consent fee payable only upon successful completion of merger
AES extends consent solicitation for $900M 2028 notes to March 31
- ▸Consent solicitation for 5.450% Senior Notes due 2028 extended to March 31
- ▸49% of $900M aggregate principal amount consented as of previous deadline
- ▸Proposed amendments require majority consent of outstanding principal
- ▸Total consent payment pool set at $2.25M for valid participants
- ▸Goldman Sachs and Citigroup serving as solicitation agents
AES extends consent solicitation for $900M 2028 notes to March 31
- ▸Consent solicitation for 5.450% senior notes due 2028 extended to March 31
- ▸49% of $900M outstanding principal consented as of previous deadline
- ▸Proposed amendments require majority consent from noteholders
- ▸Total aggregate consent payment set at $2.25M
- ▸Goldman Sachs and Citigroup serving as solicitation agents
AES extends 2028 notes consent solicitation to March 27, terminates 2030/2031 note solicitations
- ▸Extended 2028 notes consent solicitation deadline to March 27, 2026
- ▸43% of $900M 2028 notes principal consented as of March 24
- ▸Total consent payment for 2028 notes set at $2.25 million
- ▸Terminated consent solicitations for 3.950% 2030 notes and 2.450% 2031 notes
- ▸No consideration payable for terminated 2030 and 2031 note solicitations
AES extends 2028 notes consent solicitation to March 27; terminates 2030/2031 note solicitations
- ▸Extended 2028 notes consent solicitation deadline to March 27, 2026
- ▸43% of $900M 2028 notes consented as of March 24
- ▸Proposed $2.25M aggregate consent payment for 2028 noteholders
- ▸Terminated consent solicitations for 2030 and 2031 notes
- ▸No consideration payable for terminated 2030 and 2031 note solicitations
AES Secures Bondholder Consents to Advance Horizon Parent Merger Capital Structure
- ▸Secured required senior noteholder consents to support Horizon Parent merger
- ▸Amended indentures and credit agreements to facilitate change of control
- ▸Paid consent fee of $2.50 per $1,000 principal for 2032 notes
- ▸Extended consent solicitations for 2028, 2030, and 2031 notes
- ▸Reduced backstop facility requirements tied to 2032 senior notes
AES secures 2032 notes consent, amends and extends solicitations for 2028, 2030, 2031 notes
- ▸Received requisite consents for 5.800% Senior Notes due 2032
- ▸2032 Notes consent fee set at $2.50 per $1,000 principal
- ▸Supplemental indenture for 2032 notes executed March 18, 2026
- ▸Backstop facility commitments reduced by aggregate principal of 2032 notes
- ▸Amended and extended consent solicitations for 2028, 2030, and 2031 notes
AES Secures Consent for 2032 Notes Amendment, Extends Solicitations for 2028-2031 Notes
- ▸Received requisite consents for 5.800% Senior Notes due 2032
- ▸Consent fee set at $2.50 per $1,000 principal amount for 2032 Notes
- ▸Supplemental indenture for 2032 Notes executed March 18, 2026
- ▸Backstop facility commitments reduced by aggregate principal of 2032 Notes
- ▸Amended and extended consent solicitations for 2028, 2030, and 2031 Notes