GEN
TechnologyGen Digital
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2009–2025(17yr)| Metric | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.2B | $6.0B | $6.2B | $6.7B | $6.9B | $6.7B | $6.5B | $3.6B | $4.0B | $4.8B | $4.7B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $2.8B | $3.3B | $3.8B | $3.9B | +3.2% |
| Gross Profit | $4.9B | $4.9B | $5.1B | $5.6B | $5.7B | $5.5B | $5.4B | $3.0B | $3.2B | $3.8B | $3.7B | $2.1B | $2.2B | $2.4B | $2.7B | $3.1B | $3.2B | +2.5% |
| Gross Margin | 80.0% | 81.5% | 83.1% | 83.9% | 83.0% | 82.8% | 82.3% | 82.9% | 78.8% | 78.7% | 77.8% | 84.2% | 85.8% | 85.4% | 82.4% | 80.8% | 80.3% | -0.5pp |
| Operating Income | -$6.5B | $933.0M | $880.0M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $457.0M | -$100.0M | $49.0M | $380.0M | $355.0M | $896.0M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.6B | +43.5% |
| Operating Margin | -105.2% | 15.6% | 14.2% | 16.0% | 16.3% | 17.7% | 17.7% | 12.7% | -2.5% | 1.0% | 8.0% | 14.3% | 35.1% | 35.9% | 36.8% | 29.4% | 40.9% | +11.5pp |
| Net Income | -$6.8B | $714.0M | $597.0M | $1.2B | $765.0M | $898.0M | $878.0M | $2.5B | -$106.0M | $1.1B | $31.0M | $3.9B | $554.0M | $836.0M | $1.3B | $616.0M | $643.0M | +4.4% |
| Net Margin | -110.3% | 11.9% | 9.6% | 17.4% | 11.1% | 13.5% | 13.5% | 69.1% | -2.6% | 23.5% | 0.7% | 156.1% | 21.7% | 29.9% | 40.4% | 16.2% | 16.3% | +0.2pp |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $931.0M | $524.0M | -$290.0M | $808.0M | $1.3B | -$950.0M | $700.0M | $968.0M | $751.0M | $2.0B | $1.2B | -41.0% |
| FCF Margin | 22.7% | 24.1% | 24.7% | 24.0% | 18.2% | 15.3% | 14.3% | 14.6% | -7.2% | 16.7% | 27.2% | -38.2% | 27.4% | 34.6% | 22.5% | 53.6% | 30.6% | -23.0pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-8.17 | $0.87 | $0.76 | $1.57 | $1.08 | $1.28 | $1.26 | $3.71 | $-0.17 | $1.70 | $0.05 | $6.05 | $0.92 | $1.41 | $2.16 | $0.96 | $1.03 | +7.3% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
Gen Digital is a massive scale play in consumer cyber safety that is currently trapped between its high-margin cash-generation capabilities and a restrictive $8.355 billion debt pile. While it dominates consumer mindshare with 93% brand awareness for Norton, it faces a structural "platform risk" because it does not own the operating systems—Apple, Google, or Microsoft—upon which its products must run.
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
The strategy to grow loyalty through "all-in-one comprehensive cyber safety memberships" (10-K Item 1) is directly threatened by Microsoft and Apple, who often bundle security products for free within their operating systems (10-K Item 1A). This competition could render Gen Digital’s paid solutions obsolete, particularly if consumers view baseline OS protections as "good enough." Furthermore, the strategic priority of "Increasing Value" through cross-selling and up-selling is hampered by Gen Digital's $8,355 million debt load (10-K Item 1A). This leverage requires significant cash flow for interest and principal payments, potentially starving the R&DR&DResearch & Development — spending on creating new products or technologies budget needed to integrate complex generative AI tools and stay ahead of evolving scam patterns.
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
A look at recent performance reveals that Gen Digital’s headline growth is heavily reliant on acquisitions rather than organic demand. While revenue rose to $1,240 million in the most recent quarter, $218 million of that increase was a direct contribution from the MoneyLion acquisition (10-Q). This explains the divergence between the recent quarterly surge and the more modest TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter revenue growth of 3.2% (XBRL).
Gen Digital is exceptionally efficient at the operational level, boasting a 36.0% operating margin—the highest among its peer group. However, this efficiency is diluted by the time it reaches the bottom line; the net margin drops to 13.2%, trailing peers like Fortinet (29.5%) and F5 (22.0%), largely due to the costs of servicing its $7.8 billion in net debt. Market sentiment remains cautious, with short interest at 4.7% of the float, likely reflecting concerns over this high leverage (Yahoo Finance).
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At 7.6x Forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations, Gen Digital is attractively valued relative to the peer median of 25.4x. According to market-implied growth models, this price suggests the market expects long-term growth of only 0.5% (CAPM analysis). This deep discount is a direct reflection of Gen Digital’s 5.7x net leverage.
Gen Digital’s fundamentals—specifically its 29.0% FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders margin and 78.9% gross margin—support a much higher valuation, but investors are clearly demanding a massive risk premium for the debt. For this price to be "right," Gen Digital only needs to achieve its modest FY2026 revenue guidance of $4.955 billion to $4.975 billion (8-K). If Gen Digital can maintain its 3.2% growth trajectory while using its substantial free cash flow to pay down debt, the current valuation offers significant upside; however, any slowdown in the freemium-to-paid conversion rate would make the debt burden unsustainable.
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Cautious if net leverage exceeds 6x or if the FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders margin falls below 25%, signaling that interest costs or competitive pricing pressure are eroding Gen Digital's primary strength.
- Constructive if organic revenue growth (excluding the $218 million MoneyLion contribution) accelerates above 5%, proving that the "all-in-one" membership strategy is successfully capturing new market share.
- Cautious if Microsoft or Apple introduce advanced, integrated identity theft features for free, which would directly attack the value proposition of the LifeLock brand.
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: Massive global scale and 93% brand awareness that create a high-margin, captive audience for cross-selling identity and privacy services.
Bottom Line: Gen Digital is a high-cash-flow utility masquerading as a tech stock; it is a compelling value play for investors who believe the brand's staying power can outlast its debt obligations.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Innovation and AI Integration: Gen Digital must continuously develop new solutions to remain competitive. The integration of generative AI is complex and may result in unintentional, biased, or incorrect outputs, leading to reputational harm, lawsuits, and increased regulatory scrutiny.
- Competitive Environment: Gen Digital operates in highly competitive markets against software vendors, operating system providers, and financial technology firms. Competitors often bundle security products for free, which may render Gen Digital’s existing solutions obsolete and reduce market share.
- Customer Retention and Conversion: Growth depends on retaining existing customers and converting freemium users from the Avira and Avast acquisitions into paid subscribers. Failure to do so, or a decline in customer satisfaction, directly harms revenue growth and gross margins.
- Acquisition and Divestiture Challenges: Integrating complex acquisitions like MoneyLion, Avast, and Avira involves significant costs, potential loss of institutional knowledge, and the risk of failing to realize anticipated synergies or cost savings.
- Cybersecurity and Data Privacy: As a provider of cyber safety solutions, Gen Digital is a prime target for sophisticated cyberattacks. A data breach could result in significant legal, financial, and reputational damage, including government enforcement actions and loss of consumer trust.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Broadcom Dependency: The Norton endpoint security solution relies on "Engine-Related Services" provided by Broadcom. If Broadcom fails to deliver these services, it would cause significant business disruption and negatively impact Gen Digital's ability to compete.
- Contingent Value Rights (CVR): Under the CVR Agreement related to the MoneyLion acquisition, Gen Digital may be required to issue shares of common stock if Gen Digital’s stock price reaches certain thresholds, which would dilute existing stockholders.
- MoneyLion Lead Generation: The Enterprise business depends on matching consumers with Product Partners. If these partners tighten underwriting standards or cease marketing spend due to macroeconomic conditions, Enterprise revenue could be materially impacted.
- Digital Asset Custody: Gen Digital enables customers to access digital assets through Zero Hash. Because Gen Digital is not directly involved in custody and its agreement with Zero Hash does not require indemnification for losses, customers may have limited legal recourse, potentially damaging Gen Digital's brand.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- AI Regulation: The EU AI Act and various U.S. state regulations impose transparency and compliance requirements on AI systems. Non-compliance or the need to adjust offerings to meet inconsistent jurisdictional frameworks could increase the cost profile of products.
- Consumer Finance Laws: Gen Digital’s lending subsidiaries are subject to federal and state interest rate limits and consumer protection laws, including the Military Lending Act. Violations could render loans void or unenforceable and result in fines or required discontinuation of business in certain areas.
- Privacy Legislation: The CCPA and other global privacy laws require significant expenditures to ensure compliance. Failure to adhere to these standards can result in governmental enforcement actions, fines, and class-action litigation.
- BSA/AML Compliance: Certain subsidiaries are considered "financial institutions" under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). Failure to maintain an effective anti-money laundering (AML) program could lead to cease and desist orders, civil penalties, or the revocation of licenses.
4. Financial Impact Map
Innovation and AI Integration → Operating Results → Significant research and development expenses are required to maintain competitiveness; failure to achieve benefits may adversely affect operating results. Competitive Environment → Revenue → Increased competition and free offerings from rivals may lead to a reduction in revenue and loss of market share. Customer Retention and Conversion → Gross Margins → Declining retention rates or failure to convert freemium users directly harms gross margins and revenue growth. Outstanding Indebtedness → Cash Flow → $8,355 million in debt requires a substantial portion of cash flow from operations for interest and principal payments, reducing funds available for working capital and capital expenditures. Acquisition Integration → Earnings → Integration costs, asset impairments, and amortization of intangible assets result in substantial accounting charges that impact earnings.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 10-Q | Feb 2026 | Jan 2026 |
| 8-K | Feb 2026 | — |
| 14A | Jul 2025 | — |
| 10-K | May 2025 | Mar 2025 |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
Gen Digital partners with Vercel to provide safety verification for AI agent platforms
- ▸Partnership with Vercel to integrate Agent Trust Hub into AI skills ecosystem
- ▸Agent Trust Hub to classify AI skills as Safe, Low, High, or Critical Risk
- ▸Vercel platform serves over 6 million developers worldwide
- ▸Argus maintains Buy rating, lowers price target from $35 to $32
- ▸Collaboration aims to address security risks of autonomous AI agents