JPM
FinancialsJPMorgan Chase
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2007–2025(19yr)| Metric | FY 2007 | FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.4B | $67.3B | $100.4B | $102.7B | $97.2B | $97.0B | $96.6B | $94.2B | $93.5B | $95.7B | $99.6B | $109.0B | $115.6B | $119.5B | $121.6B | $128.7B | $158.1B | $177.6B | $182.4B | +2.8% |
| Net Interest Income | $26.4B | $38.8B | $51.2B | $51.0B | $47.7B | $44.9B | $43.3B | $43.6B | $43.5B | $46.1B | $50.1B | $55.1B | $57.2B | $54.6B | $52.3B | $66.7B | $89.3B | $92.6B | $95.4B | +3.1% |
| Noninterest Income | $45.0B | $28.5B | $49.3B | $51.7B | $49.5B | $52.1B | $53.3B | $50.6B | $50.0B | $49.6B | $49.5B | $54.0B | $58.4B | $65.0B | $69.3B | $62.0B | $68.8B | $85.0B | $87.0B | +2.4% |
| Noninterest Expense | $41.7B | $43.5B | $52.4B | $61.2B | $62.9B | $64.7B | $70.5B | $61.3B | $59.0B | $55.8B | $58.4B | $63.4B | $65.5B | $66.7B | $71.3B | $76.1B | $87.2B | $91.8B | $95.6B | -4.0% |
| Efficiency Ratio | 58.4% | 64.7% | 52.1% | 59.6% | 64.7% | 66.7% | 72.9% | 65.0% | 63.1% | 58.3% | 58.7% | 58.1% | 56.6% | 55.8% | 58.6% | 59.2% | 55.1% | 51.7% | 52.4% | -0.7pp |
| Net Income | $15.4B | $5.6B | $11.7B | $17.4B | $19.0B | $21.3B | $17.9B | $21.8B | $24.4B | $24.7B | $24.4B | $32.5B | $36.4B | $29.1B | $48.3B | $37.7B | $49.6B | $58.5B | $57.0B | -2.4% |
| Net Margin | 21.5% | 8.3% | 11.7% | 16.9% | 19.5% | 21.9% | 18.6% | 23.1% | 26.1% | 25.9% | 24.5% | 29.8% | 31.5% | 24.4% | 39.7% | 29.3% | 31.3% | 32.9% | 31.3% | -1.7pp |
| ROA | — | 0.26% | 0.58% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 0.85% | 1.04% | 0.99% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 1.36% | 0.86% | 1.29% | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% | 1.29% | -0.2pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | $4.33 | $1.35 | $2.26 | $3.96 | $4.48 | $5.20 | $4.35 | $5.29 | $6.00 | $6.19 | $6.31 | $9.00 | $10.72 | $8.88 | $15.36 | $12.09 | $16.23 | $19.75 | $20.02 | +1.4% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
JPMorgan Chase is a profitability powerhouse that is currently prioritizing operational efficiency over aggressive top-line expansion. While it leads the industry in nearly every margin and return metric, its revenue growth is among the slowest in its peer group, suggesting JPMorgan Chase is focused on squeezing maximum value from its massive $2.5 trillion deposit base rather than chasing risky growth.
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
JPMorgan Chase’s push into new product "innovation" is immediately challenged by "credit risks." This is best evidenced by the new Apple Card partnership; while it expands JPMorgan Chase's reach, JPMorgan Chase had to establish a $2.2 billion credit reserve for the portfolio, which reduced quarterly earnings by $0.60 per share (8-K).
Furthermore, JPMorgan Chase’s "reputation" and "transaction execution" strengths (10-K Item 1) are threatened by "extensive legal and regulatory supervision." The filing notes that regulators can force JPMorgan Chase to limit products, increase prices, or even divest assets, which would directly undermine its scale-based competitive advantage (Risks). Finally, its $93.85B in Net Interest Income is highly sensitive to "interest rate volatility," meaning a core revenue driver remains at the mercy of macroeconomic shifts it cannot control.
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
JPMorgan Chase operates with a level of efficiency its peers cannot match. Its efficiency ratio of 52.5% is significantly better than Bank of America (64.1%) and Wells Fargo (65.5%), allowing it to maintain a 31.7% net margin despite a recent 1.6 percentage point compression (XBRL). However, this efficiency masks a growth deficit: its TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter revenue growth of 2.8% is the second-lowest among its peers.
The most recent quarter showed a divergence from this trend, with revenue rising 7% (8-K). This acceleration was driven by a 17% jump in Markets & Securities Services, suggesting that when market activity is "robust," JPMorgan Chase can significantly outpace its three-year averages. With short interest at a negligible 0.7% of the float, market sentiment remains anchored in JPMorgan Chase's stability rather than fears of a downturn.
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At 12.3x Forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations, JPMorgan Chase trades exactly in line with the peer median. According to the CAPM analysis, this valuation prices in approximately 2.2% long-term growth. This is a conservative expectation that JPMorgan Chase's fundamentals easily support, given its 18.6% Return on Tangible Common Equity (ROTCEROTCEReturn on Tangible Common Equity — the primary profitability measure for bank investors; net income as a percent of tangible equity. Higher is better)—the highest in its peer group.
However, the stock is not a bargain for income seekers. Its 2.1% dividend yield and 3.8% buyback yield are both near the bottom of the peer rankings, trailing the capital return profiles of Wells Fargo and Bank of America. Investors are paying a "fair" price for quality and efficiency, but they are not being compensated with superior yield compared to other large-cap banks.
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Cautious if net margins continue to slide toward the 30% mark, indicating that JPMorgan Chase's efficiency gains have peaked.
- Constructive if the Commercial & Investment Bank (CIB) maintains double-digit revenue growth, proving that the Q4 2025 acceleration is structural rather than a one-quarter spike in client activity.
- Cautious if the $2.2 billion reserve for the Apple Card portfolio proves insufficient, signaling higher-than-anticipated credit losses in the consumer segment.
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: Unrivaled operational efficiency and a massive, low-cost funding base supported by $2.5 trillion in deposits.
Bottom Line: JPMorgan Chase is the industry's premier operator, but at current valuations, it is a play on stability and dominant market share rather than high-octane growth.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Legal and Regulatory: JPMorganChase faces extensive supervision that can force it to limit products, increase prices, reduce market-making liquidity, or divest assets. Failure to meet supervisory expectations can result in enforcement actions, penalties, and reputational harm.
- Market Risks: Unfavorable economic events, interest rate changes, and credit spread volatility directly impact JPMorganChase’s earnings, liquidity, and capital levels. Market-making positions and investment portfolios are particularly vulnerable to severe declines in asset values.
- Credit Risks: JPMorganChase is exposed to the financial condition of clients, counterparties, and central counterparties (CCPs). Declines in collateral value or concentrations of credit risk in specific industries or geographies can lead to increased allowances for credit losses and higher net charge-offs.
- Operational Risks: Dependence on complex operational systems and third-party vendors creates risks of service disruption, data quality issues, and cyber attacks. Successful cyber attacks could result in financial loss, unauthorized access to confidential information, and significant litigation costs.
- Strategic Risks: Ineffective business strategies or failure to anticipate competitive shifts—such as the rapid development of AI—could damage JPMorganChase’s competitive standing and reduce revenues.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Resolution Plan Requirements: As a systemically important financial institution, JPMorganChase must maintain a resolution plan for orderly bankruptcy without government support. Regulators can impose more stringent capital, leverage, or liquidity requirements if they find deficiencies in this plan.
- Holding Company Structure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. is a holding company dependent on dividends from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its intermediate holding company. Regulatory restrictions on these subsidiaries can limit the parent company’s ability to pay interest on debt or dividends on equity.
- Loss-Absorbing Capacity: Under the "single point of entry" resolution strategy, holders of JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s unsecured long-term debt and equity securities will absorb losses before the operating subsidiaries, effectively subordinating these investors to the creditors of the subsidiaries.
- Climate Change: Physical risks (e.g., severe weather) and transition risks (e.g., carbon taxes) could negatively impact the financial condition of JPMorganChase’s clients, thereby increasing credit risk and affecting the bank's own business strategy.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- Resolution and Recovery: JPMorganChase is subject to Federal Reserve and FDIC requirements to maintain "eligible LTD" (unsecured external long-term debt) to recapitalize subsidiaries in the event of a resolution.
- Admissions of Wrongdoing: Certain governmental authorities require JPMorganChase to admit wrongdoing to resolve investigations, which can lead to disqualification from specific business activities or jurisdictions.
- Criminal Actions: Government officials have increasingly pursued criminal actions against financial institutions, which can result in the loss of permission to operate certain businesses, either temporarily or permanently.
- Data Privacy Laws: JPMorganChase is subject to global laws regarding the collection and storage of personal information; failure to comply or protect this data can lead to enforcement actions and the requirement to cease certain operations.
4. Financial Impact Map
Legal and Regulatory Risks → Non-interest expense / Net income → Increased compliance costs, penalties, and potential loss of revenue from restricted business activities. Market Risks → Net interest income / Trading revenue → Impacted by interest rate volatility, credit spread widening, and fair value changes in financial instruments. Credit Risks → Allowance for credit losses / Net charge-offs → Increased provisions required due to counterparty defaults or declines in collateral value. Operational Risks → Non-interest expense / Reputation → Costs associated with remediation, cyber insurance gaps, and potential restitution to clients. Strategic Risks → Revenue / Operating margin → Loss of market share and increased capital investment requirements to remain competitive against non-bank and fintech rivals.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 10-K | Feb 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| 8-K | Jan 2026 | — |
| 10-Q | Nov 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| 14A | Apr 2025 | — |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
JPMorgan Asset Management Increases Short-Term Bond Exposure Following 3.1% Global Market Selloff
- ▸Global bond returns fell 3.1% in March, steepest monthly drop since October 2024
- ▸JPMorgan increasing exposure to 2-to-5-year US and UK government debt
- ▸Two-year US Treasury yields reached highest levels since June
- ▸Market repricing driven by inflation concerns and geopolitical tensions with Iran
- ▸Strategy focuses on gradual capital deployment to maintain liquidity amid volatility
SpaceX Reportedly Weighs Record IPO Targeting $1.75 Trillion Valuation
- ▸SpaceX considering IPO with potential $1.75 trillion valuation
- ▸Targeting record capital raise of approximately $75 billion
- ▸IPO remains one of the most anticipated market events
- ▸Company currently remains privately held
JPMorgan $3.8B AI Data Center Junk Bond Draws $14B in Investor Orders
- ▸JPMorgan issued $3.8B in junk bonds for AI data center project
- ▸Investor demand reached $14B, nearly 4x oversubscribed
- ▸Project anchored by Nvidia as committed tenant
- ▸Bonds priced just below investment grade despite borrower having no current revenue
- ▸Project power delivery milestones set for October 2027 and mid-2028
JPMorgan Kinexys Blockchain Platform Adds Mitsubishi as Global Payments Partner
- ▸Mitsubishi to utilize Kinexys for global cross-border payment management
- ▸Kinexys platform has processed over $3 trillion in total transactions
- ▸Current daily transaction volume on Kinexys platform reaches $5 billion
- ▸JPMorgan targets doubling daily transaction volume to $10 billion
- ▸Platform utilizes deposit-based digital tokens to facilitate near-instant fund transfers
JPMorgan launches $80B small business lending initiative to expand reach to 10 million firms
- ▸Committed $80B in small business lending over the next decade
- ▸Targeting 10 million small business clients within five years, up from 7 million
- ▸Hiring 1,000 additional small business bankers across 5,000-branch network
- ▸Doubling Senior Business Consultants corps to 150
- ▸Mentoring 115,000 small business owners through Coaching for Impact program
JPMorgan launches $80B credit initiative to add 3 million small business clients by 2034
- ▸Targeting 3 million new small business clients over the next decade
- ▸Committing $80B in credit deployment to small businesses over 10 years
- ▸Expanding Coaching for Impact program from 87 to 150 coaches
- ▸Aiming to increase program graduates from 12,000 to 115,000
- ▸Rolling out new payroll services for small business clients later this year
JPMorgan targets $10B daily blockchain transaction volume, adds Mitsubishi as partner
- ▸JPMorgan aims to double Kinexys daily transaction volume to $10 billion
- ▸Mitsubishi becomes first Japanese corporation to adopt Kinexys blockchain platform
- ▸Kinexys has processed over $3 trillion in transactions since 2020 launch
- ▸Current daily transaction volume on Kinexys platform is approximately $5 billion
- ▸Kinexys utilizes deposit tokens for near-instantaneous cross-border payments and settlements
JPMorgan faces investor pushback on $7.2B debt financing for Sealed Air acquisition
- ▸$7.2B total debt financing package for Sealed Air takeover
- ▸$4.7B loan portion seeing slower investor demand than bond portion
- ▸$2.45B bond portion receiving solid interest
- ▸Investors concerned over potential post-acquisition business spin-off clauses
- ▸CD&R acquisition of Sealed Air valued at $10.3B or $42.15/share
JPMorgan upgrades Cementos Pacasmayo to Neutral, sets $13 price target tied to Holcim tender
- ▸JPMorgan upgraded Cementos Pacasmayo to Neutral from Underweight
- ▸Price target raised to $13.00 from $7.50 based on tender offer
- ▸Holcim to acquire Inversiones Aspi, controlling 50.01% of Cementos Pacasmayo
- ▸Tender offer expected within six months of change of control approval
- ▸Fair value estimate remains unchanged at PEN 6.85
JPMorgan Faces Potential 4.8% CET1 Capital Relief Amid Regulatory and Stablecoin Policy Shifts
- ▸Proposed capital relief could reduce CET1 requirements by 4.8%
- ▸Launched pilot program tracking junior banker computer activity to monitor burnout
- ▸Lobbying against proposed restrictions on stablecoin yield payments
- ▸Defending core deposit funding against token-based payment competitors
- ▸Monitoring digital asset policy to protect lending and funding mix