LRCX

Technology

Lam Research

Price Chart

Market Data

Financials

XBRL · SEC EDGAR

2010–2025(16yr)

Revenue

Net Income

Free CF

Metric	FY 2010	FY 2011	FY 2012	FY 2013	FY 2014	FY 2015	FY 2016	FY 2017	FY 2018	FY 2019	FY 2020	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025Latest	YoY
Revenue	$2.1B	$3.2B	$2.7B	$3.6B	$4.6B	$5.3B	$5.9B	$8.0B	$11.1B	$9.7B	$10.0B	$14.6B	$17.2B	$17.4B	$14.9B	$18.4B	+23.7%
Gross Profit	$969.9M	$1.5B	$1.1B	$1.4B	$2.0B	$2.3B	$2.6B	$3.6B	$5.2B	$4.4B	$4.6B	$6.8B	$7.9B	$7.8B	$7.1B	$9.0B	+27.3%
Gross Margin	45.5%	46.2%	40.7%	39.0%	43.6%	43.4%	44.5%	45.0%	46.6%	45.1%	45.9%	46.5%	45.7%	44.6%	47.3%	48.7%	+1.4pp
Operating Income	$425.4M	$804.3M	$237.7M	$118.1M	$677.7M	$788.0M	$1.1B	$1.9B	$3.2B	$2.5B	$2.7B	$4.5B	$5.4B	$5.2B	$4.3B	$5.9B	+38.4%
Operating Margin	19.9%	24.8%	8.9%	3.3%	14.7%	15.0%	18.3%	23.7%	29.0%	25.5%	26.6%	30.6%	31.2%	29.7%	28.6%	32.0%	+3.4pp
Net Income	$346.7M	$723.7M	$168.7M	$113.9M	$632.3M	$655.6M	$914.0M	$1.7B	$2.4B	$2.2B	$2.3B	$3.9B	$4.6B	$4.5B	$3.8B	$5.4B	+40.0%
Net Margin	16.2%	22.4%	6.3%	3.2%	13.7%	12.5%	15.5%	21.2%	21.5%	22.7%	22.4%	26.7%	26.7%	25.9%	25.7%	29.1%	+3.4pp
Free Cash Flow	$315.1M	$753.5M	$391.8M	$559.1M	—	—	—	$1.9B	$2.4B	$2.9B	$1.9B	$3.2B	$2.6B	$4.7B	$4.3B	$5.4B	+27.2%
FCF Margin	14.8%	23.3%	14.7%	15.5%	—	—	—	23.4%	21.5%	29.8%	19.1%	22.1%	14.8%	26.8%	28.6%	29.4%	+0.8pp
EPS (Diluted)	$2.71	$5.79	$1.35	$0.66	$3.62	$3.70	$5.22	$9.24	$13.17	$13.70	$15.10	$26.90	$32.75	$33.21	$29.00	$4.15	-85.7%

Total Debt$4.5B

Cash & Equiv.$6.4B

Net Cash$1.9B

4 min read

1. THE BIG PICTURE

Lam Research is the essential architect of the "vertical" semiconductor era. As chipmakers move away from traditional flat designs toward complex 3D structures to meet the demands of AI and the Cloud, Lam’s specialized equipment for etching and depositing materials at the atomic level has become a prerequisite for manufacturing. Lam Research is no longer just a tool provider; it is a gatekeeper for the physical scaling of next-generation hardware.

2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST

The "close-to-customer" strategy that Lam Research cites as a competitive advantage is directly threatened by extreme customer concentration. Because a manufacturer's decision to select a specific tool for a production line typically results in long-term reliance on that vendor, losing a single "socket" at a major client like Samsung or TSMC could lead to a permanent loss of market share (10-K Item 1). This vulnerability is compounded by technological risk: if current lithography-shrinking methods reach their physical limits before Lam can successfully commercialize new 3D solutions, its massive inventory could become obsolete (Risks). Finally, Lam Research’s high-margin service business, which leverages its "broad installed base," is at the mercy of geopolitical trade restrictions that could abruptly sever its ability to support customers in China—a market that accounts for over one-third of its business (10-K Item 1A).

3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER

Lam Research is outperforming the broader equipment sector in growth, with its 23.7% revenue increase significantly outpacing rival Applied Materials’ 4.4% (XBRL). This growth is increasingly concentrated in the foundry segment, which now accounts for 59% of revenue, while memory has retreated to 34% (10-Q). Despite this shift, Lam maintains a net margin of 28.8%, which is superior to most peers but trails KLA’s 33.0%, suggesting that while Lam is efficient, its hardware-heavy mix in deposition and etch carries higher relative costs than KLA’s metrology-focused model (XBRL).

Lam Research’s capital allocation is aggressive; it returns 1.3% of its market cap to shareholders via buybacks, the second-highest rate in its peer group (XBRL). With $1.6 billion in net cash and a 22.2% free cash flow margin, Lam has the liquidity to fund the heavy R&DR&DResearch & Development — spending on creating new products or technologies required to stay ahead of technological obsolescence. Short interest is low at 2.9% of the float, indicating that market sentiment remains broadly aligned with management’s optimistic outlook for the 2026 fiscal year (Yahoo Finance).

4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?

At 31.2x Forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations, Lam Research trades exactly in line with the peer median (Yahoo Finance). According to CAPM analysis, this valuation implies the market is pricing in 11.1% long-term growth. This expectation appears grounded in reality given that Lam’s trailing revenue growth is more than double that rate, and its 1.3% buyback yield provides a consistent tailwind to earnings per share.

However, the valuation is sensitive to any deceleration. If growth were to slow to 9.5%—perhaps due to a cyclical downturn in foundry spending or further China trade curbs—the justified multiple would fall to 20.7x, representing a 34% downside from current levels (CAPM analysis). Investors are currently paying a fair price for a company that is executing well, but they are receiving little "margin of safety" for the geopolitical risks inherent in its 34% China revenue exposure.

5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?

Cautious if revenue from China (34% of FY2025) declines significantly due to new U.S. government export licensing requirements or tariffs (10-Q).
Constructive if the memory segment (currently 34% of revenue) begins to grow faster than the foundry segment (59%), signaling a broader recovery in the volatile DRAM and NAND markets (10-Q).
Cautious if gross margins (49.2%) compress toward the peer average of 44%, which would indicate that competitors like Tokyo Electron or Applied Materials are winning on price (XBRL).

6. BOTTOM LINE

Structural Advantage: High switching costs and proprietary "Equipment Intelligence" integrated across a massive installed base of 3D fabrication tools.

Bottom Line: Lam Research is a high-quality, essential play on the physical complexity of AI chips, but its valuation leaves it vulnerable to any geopolitical friction that disrupts its Chinese revenue engine.

Source: Synthesis · LLM Analysis

4 min read

1. Top 5 Material Risks

Technological Obsolescence: Lam Research faces the risk that current semiconductor manufacturing drivers, such as lithography shrinking, may reach technological limits. Failure to pivot to successful new technology solutions or to commercialize them in a timely manner could lead to inventory obsolescence and loss of market share.
Competitive Pressure: Competitors, including those backed by foreign governments with greater financial and engineering resources, may develop superior products or offer them at deep discounts. This environment threatens Lam Research’s ability to maintain pricing power and market share.
Customer Concentration: A significant portion of revenue, cash flows, and profitability is derived from a limited number of large customers. The loss of a key customer or their decision to select a competitor’s equipment for a production line application—which typically results in long-term reliance on that competitor—poses a material risk to future sales.
Geopolitical and Export Controls: With 93% of fiscal year 2025 revenue generated outside the U.S., Lam Research is highly sensitive to international trade regulations. Specifically, U.S. government export controls and licensing requirements for sales to China (which accounted for 34% of fiscal year 2025 revenue) have limited and may further restrict Lam Research's ability to sell products.
Industry Cyclicality: The semiconductor capital equipment industry is characterized by rapid growth and decline. Variability in customer demand, driven by broader economic conditions and electronics demand, requires Lam Research to manage fixed costs and resource allocation; failure to adapt to these cycles can negatively impact gross margins and earnings.

2. Company-Specific Risks

Product Concentration: Lam Research derives a substantial percentage of revenue from a limited number of products, each priced up to tens of millions of dollars. The inability to recognize revenue on even a few systems can cause a significant adverse impact on quarterly results.
Restructuring and Transformation: Efforts to align cost structures through workforce reductions and business transformation initiatives may be costly and disruptive. Failure to achieve expected operational efficiencies could negatively affect Lam Research's competitive position and financial condition.
Cybersecurity and Information Systems: Lam Research relies on critical information systems and third-party SaaS providers to manage intellectual property and sensitive data. A breach or failure could lead to the loss of confidential information, disruption of manufacturing processes, or reputational damage.
Supply Chain Single-Sourcing: Certain key components and sub-assemblies are available only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. A prolonged inability to obtain these parts could impair Lam Research's ability to ship products and generate revenue.

3. Regulatory/Legal Risks

Environmental Compliance: Lam Research is subject to evolving regulations regarding hazardous substances, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Future restrictions could require Lam Research to alter operations, acquire new equipment, or discontinue the use of certain materials, potentially increasing costs.
Taxation and BEPS 2.0: Lam Research’s effective tax rate is sensitive to the geographic composition of earnings. The implementation of global minimum tax rules under the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s BEPS 2.0 project creates uncertainty regarding future tax liabilities.
Exclusive Forum Provision: Lam Research’s bylaws designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain legal actions, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring claims in other jurisdictions and potentially discourage litigation.
Indemnity Obligations: Lam Research provides indemnification to officers, directors, and certain third parties (including customers and suppliers) for specified losses, such as intellectual property infringement claims. These obligations could result in substantial damage awards or penalties not fully covered by insurance.

4. Financial Impact Map

Technological Obsolescence → Inventory Balances → Risk of reserves on inventory due to obsolescence. Competitive Pressure → Operating Results → Potential for reduced revenues and cash flows due to deep discounting by competitors. Customer Concentration → Cash Flows → Failure of a key customer to pay obligations could significantly impact financial results. Export Controls (China) → Total Revenue → 34% of fiscal year 2025 revenue is tied to the China region, which is subject to evolving export license requirements. Industry Cyclicality → Gross Margins → Inability to adequately size supply chain and workforce during demand declines can negatively impact gross margins and earnings.

Source: 10-K Item 1A · LLM Analysis