MS
FinancialsMorgan Stanley
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2007–2025(19yr)| Metric | FY 2007 | FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.5B | $22.1B | $23.4B | $31.6B | $32.4B | $26.1B | $32.4B | $34.3B | $35.2B | $34.6B | $37.9B | $40.1B | $41.4B | $48.2B | $59.8B | $53.7B | $54.1B | $61.8B | $70.6B | +14.4% |
| Net Income | $3.2B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $4.7B | $4.1B | $68.0M | $2.9B | $3.5B | $6.1B | $6.0B | $6.1B | $8.7B | $9.0B | $11.0B | $15.0B | $11.0B | $9.1B | $13.4B | $16.9B | +25.9% |
| Net Margin | 12.1% | 7.7% | 5.8% | 14.9% | 12.7% | 0.3% | 9.0% | 10.1% | 17.4% | 17.3% | 16.1% | 21.8% | 21.8% | 22.8% | 25.2% | 20.6% | 16.8% | 21.7% | 23.9% | +2.2pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.90 | $1.39 | $-0.77 | $2.63 | $1.23 | $-0.02 | $1.36 | $1.60 | $2.90 | $2.92 | $3.07 | $4.73 | $5.19 | $6.46 | $8.03 | $6.15 | $5.18 | $7.95 | $10.21 | +28.4% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
Morgan Stanley is successfully pivoting from a volatile trading house to a tech-enabled "Integrated Firm" where a massive Wealth Management engine provides a buffer for its Institutional Securities business. While it currently leads its peer group in top-line growth, it remains a "show-me" story regarding its ability to translate that scale into the elite profit margins enjoyed by JPMorgan Chase.
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
The "Integrated Firm" strategy, which relies on leveraging client engagement across advisor-led and digital channels (Competitive Position), is directly threatened by interest rate sensitivity. Lower interest rate environments generally result in lower net interest income, which can undermine the profitability of the very Wealth Management channels Morgan Stanley is banking on for stability (Risks). Furthermore, the goal of capturing market share through "multi-year investments" (Recent Results) is vulnerable to "restrictive laws and regulations." These rules impose stringent capital and liquidity requirements that may limit Morgan Stanley’s "Financial Strength"—one of its four strategic pillars—by restricting its ability to expand operations or return cash to provincial shareholders (Competitive Position, Risks).
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
Morgan Stanley is currently a growth leader with a relative margin deficit. It posted the highest TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter revenue growth among its peers at +14.4%, yet its 23.0% net margin ranks 5th out of 6, trailing JPMorgan’s 31.7% and Bank of America’s 27.9% (Peer Benchmarking). This suggests that Morgan Stanley is prioritizing market share and aggressive technology deployment—specifically generative AI and tokenization (Business)—over immediate bottom-line efficiency. The 47% surge in Q4 investment banking revenue (Recent Results) indicates that recent growth is being driven by a structural rebound in deal-making, though this is partially offset by a 9% decline in Fixed Income revenues. Short interest is low at 1.4% of float, suggesting that despite the margin lag, there is little active betting against Morgan Stanley's current trajectory.
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At 13.1x Forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations, Morgan Stanley trades at a premium to the peer median of 12.3x (Peer Benchmarking). The market is currently pricing in approximately 3.5% long-term growth (CAPM analysis). This valuation appears supported by Morgan Stanley's +14.4% TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter revenue growth, which is the fastest in its peer group. However, investors are paying a premium for a firm that returns the least capital via buybacks; its 1.5% buyback yield is the lowest among its peers, far behind Wells Fargo’s 6.5% (Peer Benchmarking). If growth were to slow to a GDP-pace of 2.5%, the sensitivity analysis suggests a justified multiple of 11.6x, implying roughly 12% downside from current levels (CAPM analysis). The current price is only justifiable if the 47% growth in investment banking fees seen in the most recent quarter can be sustained long enough to close the margin gap with more profitable peers.
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Cautious if net margins do not continue their upward trend (from 21.7% in FY2024 to 23.9% in FY2025) toward the 27–31% range occupied by its most efficient peers.
- Constructive if the 47% growth in investment banking revenues persists for several quarters, signaling a permanent gain in market share during the current "constructive backdrop."
- Cautious if regulatory "systemic risk regimes" force a reduction in the $1.00 quarterly dividend or further curtail the $4.6 billion annual buyback program (Risks, Recent Results).
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: An integrated wealth platform that combines advisor-led and digital channels to create a stable, tech-enabled capital base for high-growth institutional banking. Bottom Line: Morgan Stanley is the sector's primary growth engine, but its premium valuation requires it to prove it can convert that revenue into top-tier profit margins.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Market Fluctuations: Global financial and economic conditions, including volatility in equity, fixed income, and commodity prices, directly impact the Institutional Securities segment. These fluctuations cause variations in business flows and the fair value of securities, which can lead to significant losses in market-making, investing, and underwriting activities.
- Interest Rate Sensitivity: Net interest income is sensitive to interest rate levels. Lower interest rate scenarios generally result in lower net interest income, while changes in rates impact client preferences for cash allocation and loan demand, potentially reducing overall profitability.
- Credit Risk and Counterparty Default: Morgan Stanley is exposed to the risk that borrowers or counterparties will fail to meet financial obligations. This includes significant credit exposure in the Institutional Securities segment from lending commitments, derivative contracts, and clearing activities, as well as margin-based and mortgage lending in the Wealth Management segment.
- Operational and Cybersecurity Risk: As a global firm processing high volumes of transactions, Morgan Stanley faces risks from system failures, human error, and cyberattacks. A breach or disruption could result in the loss of confidential information, regulatory sanctions, and financial loss, particularly given the reliance on complex technology and third-party providers.
- Liquidity Risk: Morgan Stanley relies on external sources to finance operations. An inability to access long-term or short-term debt capital markets, or a negative perception of Morgan Stanley’s financial prospects, could impair the ability to raise funding, forcing the liquidation of assets at a discount.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Concentration of Positions: Committing substantial capital to market-making, underwriting, and lending can result in large, concentrated positions in specific issuers, industries, or regions, which may lead to larger losses than those incurred by competitors if market conditions turn unfavorable.
- Holding Company Structure: As a holding company with no business operations, Morgan Stanley depends on dividends and payments from subsidiaries. Regulatory restrictions or "ring-fencing" by non-U.S. regulators can block the flow of funds, hindering the ability to meet obligations at the Parent Company level.
- Integration of Strategic Initiatives: Acquisitions, joint ventures, and partnerships (such as the relationship with Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.) present risks related to the integration of systems, management controls, and accounting processes, with no assurance that anticipated synergies will be realized.
- Climate-Related Objectives: Morgan Stanley faces reputational and financial risks if its climate-related objectives are perceived as ineffective or if it fails to manage the transition risks associated with its clients' carbon-intensive activities, which could lead to increased credit and liquidity risk.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- Resolution Planning: Morgan Stanley must submit a resolution plan every two years. If regulators determine the plan is not credible, Morgan Stanley could face more stringent capital, leverage, or liquidity requirements, or be forced to divest assets.
- Systemic Risk Regime: As a Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIBG-SIBGlobal Systemically Important Bank — a major bank designated by regulators as critical to the global financial system, subject to stricter capital requirements), Morgan Stanley is subject to heightened capital, liquidity, and funding requirements, including the maintenance of Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) to ensure Morgan Stanley can be recapitalized without taxpayer support.
- Litigation and Investigations: Morgan Stanley faces ongoing investigations by governmental and self-regulatory organizations. Adverse judgments, settlements, or fines can result in material financial loss and limitations on business activities, including the potential for criminal actions or deferred prosecution agreements.
- Conflicts of Interest: As an Integrated Firm, Morgan Stanley faces potential conflicts of interest between business segments or between Morgan Stanley and its clients. Failure to manage these conflicts can lead to regulatory scrutiny, litigation, and reputational damage.
4. Financial Impact Map
Market Fluctuations → Institutional Securities Net Revenues → Variations in business flows and fair value of securities. Interest Rate Changes → Net Interest Income → Higher rates generally increase income; lower rates decrease income. Credit Risk/Counterparty Default → Provision for Credit Losses → Potential for unexpected losses on loans and lending commitments. Operational/Cybersecurity Failure → Non-compensation Expenses → Increased costs to maintain security systems and potential regulatory fines. Liquidity/Credit Rating Downgrade → Borrowing Costs → Potential for increased collateral requirements or termination payments on OTC trading agreements.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 10-K | Feb 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| 8-K | Jan 2026 | — |
| 10-Q | Nov 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| 14A | Apr 2025 | — |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
Morgan Stanley posts four consecutive quarters of revenue and EPS beats
- ▸Four consecutive quarters of revenue and EPS beats
- ▸Analysts raising earnings estimates following consistent performance
- ▸Focus on corporate culture strategy at upcoming Oslo conference
- ▸Stock momentum shows 13.39% gain over recent period
Morgan Stanley cuts Q1 EPS estimates for asset managers, warns of valuation risks
- ▸BlackRock Q1 EPS estimate cut 11.9% on lower performance fees
- ▸Virtus Investment Partners price target slashed 19% to $125
- ▸WisdomTree Q1 EPS estimate raised 4.2%
- ▸Industry QTD ETF and mutual fund flows reached $309B, double prior year
- ▸Morgan Stanley operating income forecasts 1-2% below consensus for asset managers
McCormick to Acquire Unilever Food Unit in $44.8 Billion Merger Deal
- ▸McCormick to acquire Unilever food business for $44.8 billion total value
- ▸Deal structure: $15.7 billion cash and $29.1 billion in stock
- ▸Unilever shareholders to retain 65% stake in combined entity
- ▸Combined entity to hold brands including French’s, Hellmann’s, and Knorr
- ▸Combined food business projected to generate $20 billion in annual revenue
Morgan Stanley names MSFT, PANW, CRWD, SAIL, S as top cybersecurity picks
- ▸Morgan Stanley identifies five top cybersecurity picks for AI security growth
- ▸Microsoft security revenue run rate reaches $20B with 1.6M customers
- ▸Palo Alto Networks (PANW) price target set at $223 by Morgan Stanley
- ▸CrowdStrike (CRWD) upgraded to top pick with $510 price target
- ▸Analyst outlook driven by increasing enterprise deployment of AI agents
Inovance Technology selects banks for potential $2 billion Hong Kong IPO
- ▸Potential Hong Kong IPO could raise up to $2 billion
- ▸Selected Bank of America, CICC, Guotai Junan, and Morgan Stanley as underwriters
- ▸Company market capitalization currently approximately $26 billion
- ▸Shares have declined 25% since October record high
- ▸Proceeds intended to fund overseas expansion for industrial automation maker
Anthropic Eyes October IPO Amidst Competitive AI Infrastructure Expansion
- ▸Anthropic considering IPO as early as October
- ▸Valuation in recent funding rounds approaching $350 billion
- ▸Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley involved in early listing discussions
- ▸Blackstone committed $1 billion to Anthropic earlier this year
- ▸REX Shares and Tuttle Capital filed for leveraged products tied to future shares
Informa FY26 Revenue Guidance 6%, Final Dividend 15p, New £200M Buyback Authorized
- ▸FY26 underlying revenue guidance set at 6% +/-
- ▸Final dividend 15.0p per share, total annual dividend 22.0p
- ▸Completed £1.84B share buyback program repurchasing 260.6M shares
- ▸New £200M share buyback plan authorized January 20, 2026
- ▸Analyst fair value estimate reset from £10.84 to £10.39
Morgan Stanley restricts North Haven Private Income Fund redemptions after 11% withdrawal surge
- ▸Restricted redemptions in North Haven Private Income Fund to 5% of units
- ▸Fulfilled only 45.8% of tender requests, returning $169 million to investors
- ▸2025 record revenue of $70.6 billion overshadowed by liquidity concerns
- ▸Q4 Fixed Income net revenue fell 9% year-over-year
- ▸Shares down 6.06% YTD amid private credit liquidity fears
Morgan Stanley caps private credit fund withdrawals after redemption requests exceed 5% limit
- ▸North Haven Private Income Fund capped redemptions at 5% of shares
- ▸Fund returned ~$169M of requested capital to investors
- ▸North Haven Private Income Fund manages ~$8B in total assets
- ▸Fund reported 8.9% annualized net return over 3-year period
- ▸Liquidity position totaled $2.2B as of January 31
Morgan Stanley limits North Haven Private Income Fund withdrawals amid 11% redemption surge
- ▸North Haven Private Income Fund withdrawals restricted following surge in redemption requests
- ▸Redemption queue reached approximately 11% of fund assets
- ▸Flagged rising default risks in private credit linked to AI-driven software disruption
- ▸Firm maintains funding flexibility via multi-billion dollar fixed-to-floating note issuances
- ▸Increased focus on risk management for private credit and alternative investment products