NRG

Utilities

NRG Energy

Price Chart

Market Data

Financials

XBRL · SEC EDGAR

2007–2025(19yr)

Revenue

Net Income

Free CF

Metric	FY 2007	FY 2008	FY 2009	FY 2010	FY 2011	FY 2012	FY 2013	FY 2014	FY 2015	FY 2016	FY 2017	FY 2018	FY 2019	FY 2020	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025Latest	YoY
Revenue	$6.0B	$6.9B	$9.0B	$8.8B	$9.1B	$8.4B	$11.3B	$15.9B	$14.7B	$12.4B	$10.6B	$9.5B	$9.8B	$9.1B	$27.0B	$31.5B	$28.8B	$28.1B	$30.7B	+9.2%
Gross Profit	$2.6B	$3.3B	$3.6B	$2.8B	$2.4B	$2.3B	$3.2B	$4.1B	$3.9B	$3.8B	$3.1B	$2.4B	$2.5B	$2.6B	$6.5B	$4.1B	$2.3B	$6.0B	$6.0B	-1.3%
Gross Margin	43.6%	47.7%	40.5%	31.4%	26.5%	27.7%	28.1%	25.8%	26.7%	30.7%	29.1%	25.0%	25.6%	28.1%	24.1%	13.0%	8.0%	21.4%	19.4%	-2.1pp
Operating Income	$1.6B	$2.3B	$2.2B	$1.3B	$635.0M	$350.0M	$343.0M	$1.3B	-$4.0B	$527.0M	-$587.0M	$982.0M	$1.3B	$1.1B	$3.3B	$2.0B	$384.0M	$2.4B	$1.8B	-23.9%
Operating Margin	26.0%	33.0%	24.1%	14.8%	7.0%	4.2%	3.0%	8.0%	-27.5%	4.3%	-5.5%	10.4%	13.1%	12.2%	12.4%	6.4%	1.3%	8.6%	6.0%	-2.6pp
Net Income	$573.0M	$1.2B	$942.0M	$477.0M	$197.0M	$559.0M	-$386.0M	$134.0M	-$6.4B	-$774.0M	-$2.2B	$268.0M	$4.4B	$510.0M	$2.2B	$1.2B	-$202.0M	$1.1B	$864.0M	-23.2%
Net Margin	9.6%	17.8%	10.5%	5.4%	2.2%	6.6%	-3.4%	0.8%	-43.5%	-6.3%	-20.3%	2.8%	45.2%	5.6%	8.1%	3.9%	-0.7%	4.0%	2.8%	-1.2pp
Free Cash Flow	$1.0B	$580.0M	$1.4B	$917.0M	-$1.1B	-$2.2B	-$717.0M	$601.0M	$26.0M	$828.0M	$276.0M	$989.0M	$1.2B	$1.6B	$224.0M	-$7.0M	-$819.0M	$1.8B	$766.0M	-58.2%
FCF Margin	17.3%	8.4%	15.3%	10.4%	-12.6%	-26.7%	-6.3%	3.8%	0.2%	6.7%	2.6%	10.4%	12.1%	17.7%	0.8%	-0.0%	-2.8%	6.5%	2.5%	-4.0pp
EPS (Diluted)	$1.96	$4.43	$3.44	$1.84	$0.78	$2.35	$-1.22	$0.23	$-19.46	$-2.22	$-6.79	$0.87	$16.81	$2.07	$8.93	$5.17	$-1.12	$4.99	$4.01	-19.6%

Total Debt$16.4B

Cash & Equiv.$4.7B

Net Debt$11.7B

3 min read

1. THE BIG PICTURE

NRG is attempting to transform from a traditional utility into an integrated energy technology platform, using its Texas generation assets to shield its 8-million-customer retail business from price spikes while leveraging the Vivint platform to deepen household relationships. This strategy is currently being tested by a massive 13 GW expansion via the LSP Portfolio and a "power demand supercycle" that requires heavy capital investment in new Texas plants like T.H. Wharton and Cedar Bayou 5.

2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST

NRG’s primary strength—an "integrated model" designed to reduce third-party energy purchases (10-K Item 1)—is directly threatened by the LSP Portfolio integration. Merging 13 GW of generation assets is a complex undertaking that creates risks of operational disruption and management distraction, which could negate the very earnings stability the model is intended to provide. Furthermore, the "Customer-First Platform" is highly vulnerable to commodity volatility; if wholesale power or natural gas costs rise faster than the rates NRG can charge, NRG Energy’s multi-brand strategy cannot prevent significant margin compression, as evidenced by the recent drop in GAAPGAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles — the standard U.S. accounting rules all public companies must follow Net Income to $66 million (8-K).

3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER

NRG’s financial profile reveals a company with massive scale but the thinnest profit margins in its peer group. While revenue grew 9.2% (TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter), its 0.1% net margin and 2.4% operating margin rank last among peers like Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG), which maintains a 26.1% operating margin (XBRL). This suggests NRG’s model prioritizes volume and customer acquisition over bottom-line efficiency. The sharp divergence between the recent Q4 GAAPGAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles — the standard U.S. accounting rules all public companies must follow EPSEPSEarnings Per Share — the company's net profit divided by its share count; the most common per-share profitability metric of $0.26 and the 2026 Adjusted EPSEPSEarnings Per Share — the company's net profit divided by its share count; the most common per-share profitability metric midpoint of $8.90 is largely explained by $577 million in year-over-year GAAPGAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles — the standard U.S. accounting rules all public companies must follow income decline, driven by non-cash mark-to-market losses on economic hedges (8-K). Supplemental signals show a low short interest of 2.2% of the float, suggesting the market is not betting on a collapse, while the 3.6% buyback yield—the highest in its peer group—indicates management is using cash to manufacture EPSEPSEarnings Per Share — the company's net profit divided by its share count; the most common per-share profitability metric growth despite the thin margins.

4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?

At 13.8x Forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations, NRG trades at a modest discount to the 17.9x peer median. The market is currently pricing in approximately 4.2% long-term growth (CAPM analysis). This expectation is supported by NRG’s stated 14% Adjusted EPSEPSEarnings Per Share — the company's net profit divided by its share count; the most common per-share profitability metric growth target through 2030, which is heavily bolstered by its 3.6% share retirement rate. However, the valuation discount is justified by NRG’s inferior margin profile and a $11.2 billion net debt load. According to the valuation sensitivity data, if growth slows to a GDP-pace of 2.5%, the justified multiple would fall to 11.2x, representing roughly 19% downside from current levels. The current price is only sustainable if the LSP integration proceeds without the operational disruptions or fuel supply curtailments cited in NRG Energy's risk factors.

5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?

Cautious if the Texas segment Adjusted EBITDAEBITDAEarnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization — a rough proxy for operating cash profit, stripping out accounting adjustments continues to decline, as it fell from $327 million to $259 million in the most recent quarter.
Constructive if net margins expand toward the peer median of ~11%, signaling that the LSP integration is successfully lowering transaction costs.
Cautious if commodity price swings force a significant increase in collateral requirements, straining NRG Energy's $11.2 billion debt-heavy balance sheet.

6. BOTTOM LINE

Structural Advantage: Physical integration of 13 GW of generation with a massive retail base and proprietary smart-home data through the Vivint platform. Bottom Line: NRG is a high-leverage play on Texas power demand that offers a valuation discount, but it remains a risky bet due to peer-trailing margins and significant acquisition integration hurdles.

Source: Synthesis · LLM Analysis

4 min read

1. Top 5 Material Risks

LSP Portfolio Integration: The acquisition of 13 GW of natural gas-fired generation and demand response assets creates risks of operational disruption, management distraction, and the potential failure to realize expected revenue benefits, which could materially affect NRG Energy’s results of operations and financial condition.
Market Price Volatility: Unpredictable fluctuations in power, natural gas, coal, and oil prices threaten NRG Energy’s retail and wholesale profitability, particularly when wholesale costs rise faster than the rates NRG Energy can charge its customers.
Operational Hazards: Significant risks inherent to power generation—including equipment failure, unplanned outages, and natural disasters—threaten NRG Energy’s revenues and may result in substantial costs for replacement power or non-performance penalties if insurance coverage is insufficient.
Fuel Supply Disruptions: Reliance on third-party infrastructure for fuel delivery exposes NRG Energy to supply curtailments; if fuel is unavailable or counterparties default, NRG Energy may be forced to purchase replacement power at market prices that exceed contract prices, harming financial performance.
Liquidity and Collateral Requirements: Significant movements in commodity prices can require NRG Energy to post large amounts of cash collateral or letters of credit to counterparties, which may constrain liquidity and limit NRG Energy’s ability to manage price volatility effectively.

2. Company-Specific Risks

Load Growth Uncertainty: While NRG Energy anticipates a surge in demand from data centers and AI facilities, there is no assurance these forecasts will materialize; if growth fails to occur, NRG Energy may be unable to recover capital expenditures or may incur costs to redeploy underutilized assets.
Smart Home Intellectual Property: NRG Energy relies on patents and trade secrets to protect its smart home services; failure to defend these rights or claims of infringement by third parties could result in significant legal expenses and competitive disadvantage.
AI Implementation Risks: The adoption of GenAI in operations and products introduces risks of inaccurate outputs, model drift, and potential legal liability or brand harm if AI-driven recommendations are found to be deficient or violate privacy laws.
Unionized Labor: Approximately 4% of NRG Energy’s employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements; strikes or work stoppages could force NRG Energy to procure expensive replacement labor or experience reduced power generation.

3. Regulatory/Legal Risks

FERC Reliability Standards: NRG Energy is subject to mandatory reliability standards; failure to comply, particularly regarding "critical cyber assets," can result in FERC-imposed penalties of up to $1 million per day, per violation.
Market-Based Rate Authority: If FERC determines that NRG Energy exercises market power, it could revoke NRG Energy’s authority to sell electricity at market-based rates, forcing a transition to cost-of-service rates that could materially reduce revenue.
Data Privacy Legislation: NRG Energy faces increasing regulatory scrutiny under laws like the CCPA and PIPEDA; non-compliance with evolving data protection standards can lead to costly investigations, fines, and mandatory modifications to business practices.
FTC Settlement Compliance: Vivint Smart Home remains subject to biennial assessments by an independent third-party assessor regarding its compliance with a 2021 FTC settlement; failure to maintain full compliance could lead to further sanctions, fines, or restrictions on operations.

4. Financial Impact Map

LSP Portfolio Integration → Results of Operations and Financial Condition → Integration of 13 GW of generation assets and associated fuel/hedging contracts. Market Price Volatility → Retail and Wholesale Profitability → Inability to pass through wholesale cost increases to retail customers. Operational Hazards → Revenues and Operation and Maintenance Expenses → Unplanned outages requiring replacement power purchases at market prices. Liquidity and Collateral Requirements → Working Capital and Liquidity → Requirement to post cash collateral or letters of credit based on commodity price movements. FERC Reliability Standards → Net Income → Potential penalties of up to $1 million per day for non-compliance with mandatory reliability standards.

Source: 10-K Item 1A · LLM Analysis

Recent Filings

Form	Filed	Period
8-K	Feb 2026	—
10-K	Feb 2026	Dec 2025
10-Q	Nov 2025	Sep 2025
14A	Mar 2025	—