PEP
DefensivePepsiCo
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2007–2025(19yr)| Metric | FY 2007 | FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $39.5B | $43.3B | $43.2B | $57.8B | $66.5B | $65.5B | $66.4B | $66.7B | $63.1B | $62.8B | $63.5B | $64.7B | $67.2B | $70.4B | $79.5B | $86.4B | $91.5B | $91.9B | $93.9B | +2.3% |
| Gross Profit | $21.4B | $22.9B | $23.1B | $31.3B | $34.9B | $34.2B | $35.2B | $35.8B | $34.7B | $34.6B | $34.7B | $35.3B | $37.0B | $38.6B | $42.4B | $45.8B | $49.6B | $50.1B | $50.9B | +1.5% |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | 52.9% | 53.5% | 54.1% | 52.5% | 52.2% | 53.0% | 53.7% | 55.0% | 55.1% | 54.7% | 54.6% | 55.1% | 54.8% | 53.3% | 53.0% | 54.2% | 54.6% | 54.1% | -0.4pp |
| Operating Income | $7.2B | $7.0B | $8.0B | $8.3B | $9.6B | $9.1B | $9.7B | $9.6B | $8.4B | $9.8B | $10.5B | $10.1B | $10.3B | $10.1B | $11.2B | $11.5B | $12.0B | $12.9B | $11.5B | -10.8% |
| Operating Margin | 18.2% | 16.1% | 18.6% | 14.4% | 14.5% | 13.9% | 14.6% | 14.4% | 13.2% | 15.6% | 16.5% | 15.6% | 15.3% | 14.3% | 14.0% | 13.3% | 13.1% | 14.0% | 12.2% | -1.8pp |
| Net Income | $5.7B | $5.1B | $5.9B | $6.3B | $6.4B | $6.2B | $6.7B | $6.5B | $5.5B | $6.3B | $4.9B | $12.5B | $7.3B | $7.1B | $7.6B | $8.9B | $9.1B | $9.6B | $8.2B | -14.0% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | 11.9% | 13.8% | 10.9% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 8.6% | 10.1% | 7.6% | 19.4% | 10.9% | 10.1% | 9.6% | 10.3% | 9.9% | 10.4% | 8.8% | -1.7pp |
| Free Cash Flow | $4.5B | $4.6B | $4.7B | $5.2B | $5.6B | $5.8B | $6.9B | $7.6B | $7.8B | $7.4B | $7.0B | $6.1B | $5.4B | $6.4B | $7.0B | $5.6B | $7.9B | $7.2B | $7.7B | +6.7% |
| FCF Margin | 11.4% | 10.5% | 10.8% | 9.0% | 8.4% | 8.8% | 10.4% | 11.5% | 12.4% | 11.7% | 11.1% | 9.5% | 8.1% | 9.1% | 8.8% | 6.5% | 8.7% | 7.8% | 8.2% | +0.3pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.41 | $3.21 | $3.77 | $3.91 | $4.03 | $3.92 | $4.32 | $4.27 | $3.67 | $4.36 | $3.38 | $8.78 | $5.20 | $5.12 | $5.49 | $6.42 | $6.56 | $6.95 | $6.00 | -13.7% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
PepsiCo is currently a business of two speeds: it is a dominant global incumbent capable of generating mid-single-digit revenue growth through sheer pricing power and international scale, yet it faces a slow-motion crisis of volume in North America. While PepsiCo is pivoting toward "health and wellness" and digitalization to protect its future, its near-term stability relies on extracting more value from a shrinking pool of domestic consumption.
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
PepsiCo’s primary competitive advantage—its massive portfolio of "convenient food" brands like Lay’s and Doritos (Business)—is directly threatened by the emergence of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs, which may permanently alter consumer appetite for high-calorie snacks (Risks). This shift is compounded by PepsiCo’s high "customer concentration"; because the loss of Walmart would have a "material adverse effect" on North American operations (Competitive Position), PepsiCo has limited room to maneuver if major retailers demand lower prices to accommodate cash-strapped consumers. Furthermore, PepsiCo’s "Beyond the Bottle" strategy and SodaStream innovation are not just growth initiatives but necessary defenses against increasing global taxes on sugar and sodium (Risks).
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
The financial data reveals a disconnect between top-line revenue and underlying consumer demand. In the most recent quarter, PepsiCo reported a 5.6% increase in net revenue, yet organic volumes actually fell by 1% in North American foods and 4% in North American beverages (8-K). This divergence suggests that recent growth is entirely structural—driven by price hikes rather than increased consumption. While management cites "sequential acceleration" in the fourth quarter, the TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter revenue growth of 2.3% (XBRL) is more reflective of the long-term trend.
PepsiCo also operates with a significantly thinner margin profile than its primary rival; its 13.4% operating margin is less than half of Coca-Cola’s 30.1% (Peer Benchmarking). This is partly due to the different capital intensities of the snack business versus pure-play beverages. However, with net debt at $42.7B—representing a 6.3x leverage ratio against its $6.8B in annual free cash flow—PepsiCo has less financial flexibility than peers to absorb a prolonged volume downturn (Computed Valuation).
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At a forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations of 17.7x, PepsiCo trades at a modest discount to the peer median of 22.4x (Peer Benchmarking). This lower multiple reflects the market pricing in a long-term growth rate of just 0.9% (Computed Valuation). This valuation appears justified, as PepsiCo’s 2026 organic growth guidance of 2% to 4% (8-K) is modest and vulnerable to the "commodity price volatility" cited in its risk disclosures.
While PepsiCo offers the highest dividend yield in its peer group at 3.5%, it ranks near the bottom for buyback yield at 0.5% (Peer Benchmarking). Investors are essentially being paid to wait for a turnaround in volume, but the high debt load and the "significant CSD share advantage" held by Coca-Cola outside the U.S. (Competitive Position) suggest that a valuation re-rating is unlikely until PepsiCo proves it can grow without relying solely on price increases.
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Constructive if North American organic volumes return to positive growth, signaling that "sharper value" initiatives (8-K) are successfully winning back consumers without eroding margins.
- Cautious if the "free cash flow conversion ratio" (8-K) falls below the 80% target, which would signal that PepsiCo’s 6.3x debt leverage is becoming a structural drag on shareholder returns.
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: A dual-threat distribution network (DSD) that provides "maximum visibility" for a complementary portfolio of snacks and drinks across 200 countries.
Bottom Line: PepsiCo is a high-yield defensive play for a low-growth environment, but its reliance on pricing power over volume makes it a risky bet if health-driven consumer shifts accelerate.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Consumer Preference Shifts: PepsiCo faces risks from evolving diet trends, including the adoption of GLP-1 weight-loss medications, which may reduce demand for its food and beverage products. Failure to innovate or respond to these shifts can lead to inventory write-offs and eroded market position.
- Supply Chain and Manufacturing Disruption: Geopolitical tensions, wars, and natural disasters threaten the availability of raw materials and production capabilities. PepsiCo relies on sole or limited-source suppliers for certain packaging and ingredients, making it vulnerable to cost spikes and supply interruptions.
- Reputational Damage: Negative perceptions regarding the "ultra-processed" nature of products, environmental impact of plastic packaging, or workforce policies can lead to public boycotts and decreased demand.
- Product Quality and Safety: Recalls due to contamination, mislabeling, or undeclared allergens result in direct losses from inventory destruction, customer fines, and legal fees, while also damaging consumer confidence.
- Competitive Intensity: PepsiCo competes against international, regional, and private-label brands. Failure to execute on 2025 commercial and financial priorities or to effectively market new products can lead to a loss of category share and the need for increased capital and marketing expenditures.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Water Scarcity: As a manufacturer, PepsiCo requires significant water access. Climate change-induced water stress threatens to increase compliance costs, force facility relocations, and necessitate higher capital expenditures for efficiency technologies.
- Retail Landscape Evolution: The growth of hard discounters and e-commerce channels, combined with retailers prioritizing private-label brands, threatens PepsiCo’s shelf space and ability to maintain relationships with key customers.
- Business Transformation Outages: The multi-year migration to enterprise-wide financial processing systems has caused, and may continue to cause, systems outages and operating inefficiencies.
- Strategic Transaction Integration: PepsiCo’s portfolio management involves frequent acquisitions and divestitures. Failure to realize expected synergies or successfully integrate IT and accounting systems from these transactions can result in impairment charges and operational disruption.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- Ingredient-Based Taxation: Jurisdictions are increasingly imposing taxes on products containing sugar, sodium, or saturated fat. For example, Mexico will increase its flat tax on sweetened beverages to approximately $0.17 (3.08 Mexican pesos) per liter effective January 1, 2026.
- Labeling and Marketing Restrictions: New laws, such as the 2025 Texas legislation effective January 1, 2027, require warning labels for ingredients like artificial colors. Other jurisdictions are considering restrictions on "ultra-processed" foods and color-coded labeling requirements.
- Global Minimum Tax: Numerous countries are enacting legislation to incorporate the OECD model rules for a 15% global minimum tax, with widespread implementation expected by the end of 2026, which will increase PepsiCo’s provision for income taxes.
- Data Privacy Compliance: PepsiCo is subject to evolving regulations including the California Consumer Privacy Act, the EU’s GDPR, and China’s Personal Information Protection Act. Failure to comply with these complex, inconsistent requirements can result in significant fines and penalties.
4. Financial Impact Map
Consumer Preference Shifts → Revenue → Inability to anticipate trends leads to reduced demand and inventory write-offs. Supply Chain Disruption → Operating Results → Commodity and packaging price volatility can reduce margins if PepsiCo cannot pass costs to consumers. Product Recalls → Net Income → Costs include destruction of inventory, customer fines, legal fees, and lost sales. Global Minimum Tax → Provision for Income Taxes → Implementation of 15% global minimum tax will increase tax expenses. Strategic Transactions → Goodwill and Intangible Assets → Failure to realize expected returns or synergies can result in impairment charges.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 10-K | Feb 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| 8-K | Feb 2026 | — |
| 10-Q | Oct 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| 14A | Mar 2025 | — |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
McCormick to combine with Unilever food business in $65.8 billion deal
- ▸Combined company valued at approximately $65.8 billion
- ▸Unilever food business excludes India operations
- ▸Unilever food business reported 2.5% sales growth last year
- ▸Unilever food business operating profits grew 2.7% last year
- ▸McCormick shares rose 3% in premarket trading following announcement
PepsiCo Q4 Revenue $29.34B +5.6% YoY, Full-Year Net Income Falls 14%
- ▸Q4 revenue $29.34B, +5.6% YoY driven by international segments
- ▸EMEA segment operating profit +72% YoY
- ▸Full-year net income -13.97%, operating income -19.57%
- ▸Recognized $1.9B in intangible asset impairments, including Rockstar brand
- ▸Announced new $10B share repurchase program through February 2030
Reed's CEO Cyril Wallace resigns; COO Neal Cohane named interim chief
- ▸CEO Cyril Wallace resigns after less than one year in position
- ▸COO Neal Cohane appointed interim CEO effective immediately
- ▸CMO Tina Reejsinghani departs; Rudolf Bakker named fractional CMO
- ▸FY2025 net sales -10% to $34.1M; EBITDA loss widened to $14.6M
- ▸Q4 net sales -22% to $7.5M; Q4 net loss $3.8M
PepsiCo authorizes $10B share buyback, increases annualized dividend by 4% to June
- ▸Authorized $10B share repurchase program effective through February 28, 2030
- ▸Annualized dividend increased 4%, effective June 2026 payment
- ▸Plans to cut snack prices by up to 15% to boost volumes
- ▸Management reiterates 2026 guidance of 4% to 6% sales growth
- ▸Piper Sandler raised price target to $181, citing 2026 product pipeline
Varun Beverages to acquire South Africa's Crickley Dairy for R238m ($14.3m)
- ▸Acquiring Crickley Dairy from Clark Holdings for R238m ($14.3m)
- ▸Strategic expansion into value-added dairy and juice-based beverage categories
- ▸Deal executed via subsidiary The Beverage Company
- ▸Follows recent acquisitions of Twizza and entry into South African market
- ▸FY24 revenue Rs222.25bn ($2.40bn), up 8.5% YoY
PepsiCo targets $101.5B revenue by 2028 amid Elliott-led operational overhaul
- ▸Elliott Investment Management holds roughly $4B stake in PepsiCo
- ▸Company initiating 20% product portfolio reduction and supply chain overhaul
- ▸Projecting $101.5B revenue and $11.8B earnings by 2028
- ▸Collaborating with NVIDIA and Siemens to deploy AI-driven manufacturing tools
- ▸Lost NBA soft drink sponsorship to Coca-Cola's Sprite brand
PepsiCo Settles With Elliott Management Over $4B Stake, Targets Operational Efficiency
- ▸Elliott Management secures $4B stake in PepsiCo
- ▸Settlement mandates expense cuts and portfolio reduction
- ▸Agreement includes potential leadership adjustments
- ▸Launched 'Good Warrior' meat snacks to enter protein category
- ▸Focus on margin improvement and operational efficiency
PepsiCo acquires prebiotic soda brand Poppi for $1.95 billion to expand functional beverage portfolio
- ▸Acquired prebiotic soda brand Poppi for $1.95 billion
- ▸Poppi brand launching in UK market to expand functional beverage reach
- ▸Strategic focus on low-sugar, high-fiber products for health-conscious consumers
- ▸PepsiCo shares trading at $160.78, approximately 6% below analyst price targets
- ▸Acquisition aims to reshape beverage earnings mix toward functional health products