PGR
FinancialsProgressive Corporation
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2007–2025(19yr)| Metric | FY 2007 | FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.7B | $12.8B | $14.6B | $15.0B | $15.5B | $17.1B | $18.2B | $19.4B | $20.9B | $23.4B | $26.8B | $32.0B | $39.0B | $42.7B | $47.7B | $49.6B | $62.1B | $75.4B | $87.7B | +16.3% |
| Net Income | $1.2B | -$70.0M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $902.3M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $1.6B | $2.6B | $4.0B | $5.7B | $3.4B | $721.5M | $3.9B | $8.5B | $11.3B | +33.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | -0.5% | 7.3% | 7.1% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 6.4% | 6.6% | 6.1% | 4.4% | 5.9% | 8.2% | 10.2% | 13.4% | 7.0% | 1.5% | 6.3% | 11.3% | 12.9% | +1.6pp |
| ROA | — | -0.38% | 5.27% | 5.05% | 4.65% | 3.98% | 4.77% | 4.97% | 4.25% | 3.08% | 4.11% | 5.62% | 7.23% | 8.90% | 4.71% | 0.96% | 4.40% | 8.02% | 9.19% | +1.2pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.65 | $-0.10 | $1.57 | $1.61 | $1.59 | $1.48 | $1.93 | $2.15 | $2.15 | $1.76 | $2.72 | $4.42 | $6.72 | $9.66 | $5.66 | $1.18 | $6.58 | $14.40 | $19.23 | +33.5% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
Progressive is successfully transitioning from a specialist auto insurer into a "bundled" household destination, using its data-driven pricing edge to take market share from legacy carriers. While it leads peers in growth and asset efficiency, its bottom line remains tethered to the accuracy of its proprietary algorithms and the inherent unpredictability of severe weather events.
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
The "Destination Era" strategy of bundling personal auto with property products is threatened by catastrophe exposure because property policies are concentrated in states with high exposure to hurricanes and hailstorms (RISKS). Furthermore, the reliance on data-driven pricing models like Snapshot is vulnerable to loss reserve uncertainty; if medical cost inflation or legal outcomes deviate from historical projections, Progressive Corporation’s "96 or better" combined ratio goal becomes unattainable (COMPETITIVE POSITION). Finally, the push for digital quoting through platforms like HomeQuote Explorer is threatened by cybersecurity risks, where a system failure could jeopardize the data gathering that Progressive cites as its most significant competitive advantage (BUSINESS).
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
Progressive’s 16.3% revenue growth significantly outperforms the peer median, yet its net margin of 12.6% ranks only third (PEER BENCHMARKING). This suggests that while Progressive is aggressive in customer acquisition—evidenced by an 11% jump in personal lines policies—it is prioritizing volume and market share over the peak profitability seen at peers like Chubb. The 22% jump in net income in the most recent quarter occurred despite a massive $950 million policyholder credit in Florida related to excess profits (10-Q). This indicates that underlying operational strength is currently masking significant regulatory and one-time costs. Short interest is low at 1.2% of the float, suggesting broad market confidence in this growth trajectory (Yahoo Finance).
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At a forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations of 12.8x, Progressive trades at a 14% premium to the peer median of 11.2x (PEER BENCHMARKING). This premium is supported by an 8.8% return on assets—more than double the ROAROAReturn on Assets — net income as a percentage of total assets. For banks, 1%+ is generally considered strong of most peers—and a revenue growth rate nearly triple that of Allstate or Travelers. At 12.8x forward earnings, the market is pricing in approximately 0.5% long-term growth (CAPM analysis). Given that Progressive’s actual revenue growth is 16.3% and its ROTCEROTCEReturn on Tangible Common Equity — the primary profitability measure for bank investors; net income as a percent of tangible equity. Higher is better is 30.4%, the current price appears to leave significant room for appreciation if Progressive Corporation even approaches GDP-level growth of 2.5%. The primary risk that could compress this multiple is a failure in loss reserve estimation, which could lead to paid losses materially exceeding reported estimates (RISKS).
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Cautious if the combined ratio consistently exceeds the "96 or better" target, signaling that pricing models are failing to keep up with inflation or catastrophe costs (COMPETITIVE POSITION).
- Constructive if the "Robinsons" initiative for bundled households shows a measurable increase in retention rates, lowering the long-term cost of customer acquisition (10-Q).
- Cautious if reinsurance market conditions limit the availability of coverage, forcing Progressive to retain more catastrophe risk on its own balance sheet (RISKS).
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: Proprietary data-driven pricing models (Snapshot) and a high-retention "bundling" strategy for household insurance. Bottom Line: Progressive is a high-efficiency growth engine that justifies its premium valuation through superior asset returns and market-leading expansion.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Pricing and Underwriting Accuracy: Progressive Corporation relies on historical data and projections to set rates. Failure to accurately predict loss severity, frequency, or inflation can lead to underpricing, which erodes underwriting profit margins, or overpricing, which reduces competitiveness and growth.
- Loss Reserve Estimation: The financial statements of Progressive Corporation include loss reserves based on estimates of future claim payments. Inherent uncertainties—including medical cost inflation, labor shortages, and legal outcomes—mean that ultimate paid losses may deviate substantially from these estimates.
- Catastrophe Exposure: Severe weather events (hurricanes, tornadoes, floods) and other catastrophes materially affect insurance operating results. The property business of Progressive Corporation has a concentration of policies in states with high exposure to hurricanes and hailstorms, making it more vulnerable than other segments.
- Reinsurance Availability and Cost: Progressive Corporation relies on reinsurance to manage exposure to catastrophe events. If reinsurers are unable to pay claims or if market conditions limit the availability of coverage at reasonable costs, the financial condition and profitability of Progressive Corporation could be adversely affected.
- Cybersecurity and System Integrity: Progressive Corporation depends on complex technology systems and third-party vendors. A security breach, data corruption, or system disruption could result in substantial liability, loss of sensitive customer data, and significant operational disruption.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Holding Company Structure: Progressive Corporation is a holding company with no operations of its own; its ability to pay dividends, service debt, or fund subsidiaries depends entirely on the ability of its insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends, which are restricted by regulatory capital requirements.
- Long-Term Strategy Trade-offs: Progressive Corporation prioritizes long-term enterprise value over short-term earnings, meaning it does not manage to analyst expectations. This strategy may lead to volatility in the price of equity or debt securities when reported results deviate from market expectations.
- Brand and Reputation Sensitivity: Progressive Corporation invests heavily in its brand and marketing. Negative perceptions regarding corporate governance, sustainability, or the conduct of employees and third-party partners can decrease product demand and hinder employee recruitment.
- Tax-Advantaged Investment Risks: Progressive Corporation invests in projects like affordable housing and renewable energy for tax credits. These investments are subject to recapture or invalidation by taxing authorities if specific requirements are not met, which could negatively impact the financial condition of Progressive Corporation.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- Rating Factor Restrictions: Legislative and regulatory initiatives seeking to limit the use of specific rating factors (e.g., credit, education, occupation) threaten the ability of Progressive Corporation to match insurance rates to risk, potentially undermining the effectiveness of risk-based pricing.
- Compliance Complexity: Progressive Corporation operates in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Bermuda, and Canada. Inconsistent requirements and the pace of regulatory change increase compliance costs and limit the ability of Progressive Corporation to respond to evolving business conditions.
- Litigation Exposure: Progressive Corporation is a defendant in various class and individual lawsuits. Adverse court decisions or significant settlements can result in material increases in the cost of doing business and threaten the use of important business practices.
- Artificial Intelligence Regulation: The adoption of AI-focused regulations, such as the NAIC model bulletin, imposes new compliance and reporting requirements. Failure to comply with these evolving standards could lead to operational difficulties and reputational harm.
4. Financial Impact Map
Pricing and Underwriting Accuracy → Underwriting Profit Margins → Inaccurate data or assumptions could lead to underpricing, negatively affecting margins.
Loss Reserve Estimation → Loss Reserves (Balance Sheet) → Ultimate paid losses may materially exceed reported reserves, impacting financial condition.
Catastrophe Exposure → Property Business Profitability → Concentration of policies in hurricane-prone states makes results sensitive to severe weather.
Reinsurance Availability → Profitability and Business Volume → Unavailability or increased cost of reinsurance could adversely affect business volume and financial condition.
Holding Company Structure → Dividends and Debt Service → Inability of insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends limits the ability of Progressive Corporation to meet obligations.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 10-K | Mar 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| 8-K | Jan 2026 | — |
| 10-Q | Nov 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| 14A | Mar 2025 | — |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
Progressive Q4 Revenue $22.75B +12.2% YoY, Beats Estimates by 0.6%
- ▸Progressive Q4 revenue $22.75B, +12.2% YoY, beat estimates by 0.6%
- ▸First American Financial Q4 revenue $2.05B, +21.6% YoY, beat estimates by 15.2%
- ▸P&C insurance sector Q4 revenue beat consensus estimates by 2.9%
- ▸P&C insurance stocks down 7.5% on average since Q4 earnings reports
- ▸Progressive shares down 6.9% since reporting Q4 results
Progressive February Net Income $943M +2%, Policies in Force +10% YoY
- ▸February net income $943M, up 2% monthly
- ▸Total policies in force 39.2 million, +10% YoY
- ▸Direct auto policies surged 14% YoY
- ▸Combined ratio increased to 85.7 from 82.6
- ▸Mizuho lowered price target to $223 from $235
Progressive Prices $1.5 Billion Senior Notes Offering Due 2031 and 2036
- ▸Priced $500M 4.60% Senior Notes due 2031 at 99.987% of par
- ▸Priced $1B 5.15% Senior Notes due 2036 at 99.676% of par
- ▸Total offering size $1.5 billion in aggregate principal
- ▸Goldman Sachs and TD Securities acting as joint bookrunners
- ▸Offering conducted under effective SEC registration statement
BMO cuts Progressive price target to $208 from $232 citing softening pricing power
- ▸BMO Capital lowered PGR price target to $208 from $232
- ▸Rating maintained at Market Perform
- ▸Pricing power expected to soften in auto insurance market
- ▸AI adoption expected to drive expense ratio efficiencies
- ▸Quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share declared for April 10 payment
Progressive CFO John Sauerland to retire July 3; Andrew Quigg named successor
- ▸CFO John Sauerland retiring July 3 after 35-year tenure
- ▸Chief Strategy Officer Andrew Quigg appointed as incoming CFO
- ▸Quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share declared, payable April 10, 2026
- ▸Projected 2028 revenue of $106.0 billion and earnings of $9.6 billion
- ▸Management transition framed as continuity in financial stewardship
Progressive CFO John Sauerland to retire; Andrew Quigg named as successor
- ▸CFO John Sauerland retiring after 35-year tenure
- ▸Andrew Quigg appointed as successor in planned leadership transition
- ▸Analysts forecast 4.1% average annual earnings decline over next 3 years
- ▸Stock trading at $201.22, approximately 18% below analyst price target
- ▸Simply Wall St estimates shares trading 54% below fair value
Goldman Sachs Reaffirms Buy Rating on Progressive, Sets $225 Price Target
- ▸January 2026 net income $1.16B, +4% YoY
- ▸Net premiums written $6.74B, +4% YoY
- ▸Net premiums earned $6.92B, +5% YoY
- ▸Projected 2026 policies in force growth of 8.1% vs 7.3% estimate
- ▸Goldman Sachs maintains $225 price target and buy rating
CNA Q4 EPS $1.16 misses estimates, revenue $3.4B up 3.8% YoY
- ▸Q4 core earnings $1.16/share, missed consensus by 3.3%
- ▸Total operating revenue $3.4B, up 3.8% YoY but missed estimates by 1.2%
- ▸Property & Casualty net written premiums $2.8B, up 2% YoY
- ▸Combined ratio deteriorated 70 bps YoY to 93.8
- ▸Net investment income $653M, up 1.4% YoY