PSX
EnergyPhillips 66
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2010–2025(16yr)| Metric | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $146.6B | $196.1B | $179.5B | $171.6B | $161.2B | $99.0B | $84.3B | $102.4B | $111.5B | $107.3B | $64.1B | $111.5B | $170.0B | $147.4B | $143.2B | $132.4B | -7.5% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | $21.8B | $22.9B | $13.5B | $11.8B | $6.4B | $9.4B | $20.1B | $19.3B | $13.2B | $16.3B | +23.4% |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.9% | 22.4% | 12.1% | 11.0% | 10.0% | 8.4% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 9.2% | 12.3% | +3.1pp |
| Net Income | $735.0M | $4.8B | $4.1B | $3.7B | $4.8B | $4.2B | $1.6B | $5.1B | $5.6B | $3.1B | -$4.0B | $1.3B | $11.0B | $7.0B | $2.1B | $4.4B | +108.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 2.4% | 2.3% | 2.2% | 3.0% | 4.3% | 1.8% | 5.0% | 5.0% | 2.9% | -6.2% | 1.2% | 6.5% | 4.8% | 1.5% | 3.3% | +1.8pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.16 | $7.52 | $6.48 | $6.02 | $8.33 | $7.73 | $2.92 | $9.85 | $11.80 | $6.77 | $-9.06 | $2.97 | $23.27 | $15.48 | $4.99 | $10.79 | +116.2% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
Phillips 66 is performing a high-stakes balancing act: milking a volatile, low-margin refining business to fund a capital-intensive pivot into renewables and petrochemicals. While the most recent quarter showed a dramatic earnings recovery to $2.9 billion, the underlying business remains a thin-margin operation struggling with a shrinking top line (8-K).
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
The "wellhead-to-market" integrated strategy is directly threatened by regulatory intervention because California’s SBx 1-2 targets the refining margins that fund this integration. Furthermore, the operational scale provided by its global footprint is a liability when facing "inherent hazards" like the decommissioning of the Los Angeles Refinery; such moves create significant remediation costs while removing the very productive capacity needed to fund the transition to renewable diesel at the Rodeo Complex (10-K Item 1A, 8-K).
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
The financial data reveals a stark divergence between bottom-line performance and top-line health. While earnings swung from $133 million to $2.9 billion in a single quarter, revenue is actually shrinking at a 7.5% annual clip—the worst performance among its peer group (8-K, XBRL). This suggests the recent profit surge was driven by a temporary recovery in Refining and Marketing margins rather than structural growth. With a net margin of just 1.4%, Phillips 66 has a thin cushion compared to midstream peers like Williams (22.7%), making it uniquely vulnerable to the commodity price swings it cites as its top risk (XBRL). Short interest remains low at 2.0% of the float, suggesting that while growth is absent, the market is not yet betting on a collapse (Yahoo Finance).
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At 12.6x forward earnings, Phillips 66 trades at a modest discount to the peer median of 15.7x. The market is pricing in a long-term growth rate of just 1.4%, which is consistent with Phillips 66's recent -7.5% revenue contraction (CAPM analysis, XBRL). This discount is justified by an operating margin of 2.7%, which sits at the bottom of the peer set and reflects the high-volume, low-margin nature of refining compared to pure-play midstream operators (XBRL). Investors are essentially paying for a 3.1% dividend and a 2.7% buyback yield, but the sustainability of these returns depends entirely on the Refining segment avoiding the losses it saw earlier in 2025 (8-K).
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Cautious if refining margins in the Marketing and Specialties segment—which provided the bulk of Q4 gains—revert to Q3 levels, which would jeopardize the $1.3 billion allocated for organic growth in the 2026 capital budget (8-K).
- Constructive if the Golden Triangle Polymers or Ras Laffan projects come online ahead of schedule, providing the Chemicals segment with the scale needed to reverse its recent $12 million loss (8-K).
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: A "wellhead-to-market" NGL value chain that integrates gathering, processing, and transportation to capture margins across the midstream and chemical sectors.
Bottom Line: Phillips 66 is a low-margin turnaround play that offers competitive shareholder yields but lacks the top-line momentum to justify a higher valuation.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Cyclical and Volatile Margins: Phillips 66’s financial results depend on the margin between the prices of refined products and the cost of feedstocks (crude oil, natural gas, NGLs, and renewable feedstocks). This volatility is driven by factors beyond Phillips 66’s control, including global demand, OPEC production levels, and geopolitical conflicts.
- Operational Hazards and Downtime: Phillips 66 faces inherent risks in its refining, chemicals, and midstream businesses, such as fires, explosions, and releases. These incidents, alongside planned turnarounds or weather-related shutdowns (e.g., hurricanes), can impair the ability to operate assets and result in significant property damage, personal injury, and environmental remediation costs.
- Supply and Offtake Interruptions: Reliance on third-party transportation for crude oil and refined products exposes Phillips 66 to supply chain disruptions caused by weather, accidents, or protests. Failure to maintain throughput levels on pipelines and processing facilities due to these disruptions or declining drilling activity can negatively impact financial results.
- Regulatory and Legislative Impacts: Government policies, such as California’s SBx 1-2, create uncertainty by authorizing maximum gross gasoline refining margins and financial penalties for excess profits. These regulations may also restrict the timing of maintenance activities and impose burdensome reporting requirements.
- Climate Change and Environmental Regulation: Increasing regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and renewable fuel standards (RFS) requires Phillips 66 to incur substantial capital expenditures to comply with emission controls and purchase Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs). Failure to pass these costs to customers or meet compliance obligations could materially affect financial performance.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Joint Venture Control: Phillips 66 conducts significant portions of its Midstream, Refining, M&S, and Chemicals segments through joint ventures where it shares control. Partners may have inconsistent goals, or Phillips 66 may be required to fulfill the economic obligations of a partner if they are unable to meet them.
- Credit Rating Downgrades: A downgrade of Phillips 66’s credit rating below investment grade could trigger specific contractual rights, such as Chevron Corporation’s option to purchase Phillips 66’s 50% interest in CPChem at fair market value.
- Shareholder Activism: Phillips 66 has been and may again be subject to campaigns by activist shareholders advocating for operational or governance changes, which can disrupt business strategy and divert management attention.
- ConocoPhillips Indemnification: Phillips 66 remains subject to contingent liabilities from its 2012 separation from ConocoPhillips. While ConocoPhillips provides indemnification for certain matters, it may not be able to satisfy these obligations in the future.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- California SBx 1-2: Authorizes the California Energy Commission to set maximum gross gasoline refining margins and impose penalties for profits exceeding these caps, while also regulating the timing of refinery turnarounds.
- Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS): Requires Phillips 66 to blend renewable fuels into motor fuels or purchase RINs. Volatility in RIN prices and the potential for a "blend wall" (where blending exceeds commercial feasibility) pose risks to financial results.
- Climate Litigation: Phillips 66 is a defendant in lawsuits filed by various U.S. governmental entities seeking damages and abatement related to climate change under various tort theories.
- Greenwashing Allegations: Phillips 66 faces legal and regulatory risks regarding claims that its public statements on climate change and environmental, social, and governance (E&S) matters are false or misleading.
4. Financial Impact Map
Cyclical Margins → Results of Operations and Cash Flows → Significant reductions in margins may require impairment of the carrying value of assets (properties, plants, equipment, inventories, goodwill). Operational Hazards → Financial Condition and Results of Operations → Potential for substantial remediation fines, penalties, and legal liabilities exceeding insurance coverage. Regulatory Compliance (RFS/RINs) → Financial Position and Results of Operations → Costs associated with purchasing RINs or potential reduction in produced motor fuel sales if compliance obligations are not met. Credit Rating Downgrade → Cost of Borrowing and Financial Flexibility → Increased borrowing costs and potential requirement to provide collateral or security. Climate Change Regulation → Capital Expenditures and Operating Costs → Increased costs to install emission controls, administer emissions programs, and acquire emission credits or allotments.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 10-K | Feb 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| 8-K | Feb 2026 | — |
| 10-Q | Oct 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| 14A | Apr 2024 | — |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
Raymond James raises Phillips 66 price target to $205 citing refining margin expansion
- ▸Raymond James raised PSX price target from $175 to $205
- ▸Q4 2025 realized refining margins $12.48/bbl vs $6.08/bbl in Q4 2024
- ▸WRB Refining acquisition increased heavy crude exposure by 40%
- ▸Each $1 widening in crude differential adds $140M in annual earnings
- ▸Company distributed $14.3B to shareholders since July 2022
Phillips 66 raises quarterly dividend 5.8% to $1.27 per share
- ▸Quarterly dividend increased $0.07 to $1.27 per share
- ▸Dividend payable March 4, 2026, to shareholders of record February 23, 2026
- ▸Western Gateway Pipeline open season closed with secured shipper commitments
- ▸Planning direct heavy crude purchases from Venezuela's PDVSA starting April
- ▸Analysts adjust price targets ranging from $138 to $186