SLB
EnergySchlumberger
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2010–2025(16yr)| Metric | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $27.4B | $39.5B | $42.1B | $45.3B | $48.6B | $35.5B | $27.8B | $30.4B | $32.8B | $32.9B | $23.6B | $22.9B | $28.1B | $33.1B | $36.3B | $35.7B | -1.6% |
| Gross Profit | $5.9B | $10.6B | $9.1B | $9.9B | $11.2B | $7.2B | $21.6B | $22.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 26.8% | 21.6% | 21.9% | 23.0% | 20.2% | 77.6% | 72.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | — | — | — | $9.3B | $10.6B | $6.5B | $3.3B | $3.9B | $4.2B | $4.0B | $2.4B | $3.4B | $5.0B | $6.5B | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | 20.6% | 21.8% | 18.4% | 11.8% | 12.9% | 12.8% | 12.1% | 10.2% | 14.7% | 17.8% | 19.7% | — | — | — |
| Net Income | $4.3B | $5.0B | $5.5B | $6.7B | $5.4B | $2.1B | -$1.7B | -$1.5B | $2.1B | -$10.1B | -$10.5B | $1.9B | $3.4B | $4.2B | $4.5B | $3.4B | -24.4% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 12.6% | 13.0% | 14.9% | 11.2% | 5.8% | -6.1% | -4.9% | 6.5% | -30.8% | -44.6% | 8.2% | 12.2% | 12.7% | 12.3% | 9.4% | -2.8pp |
| Free Cash Flow | $2.6B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $5.8B | — | — | $4.2B | $3.6B | $3.6B | $3.7B | $1.8B | $3.5B | $2.1B | $4.7B | $4.7B | $4.8B | +2.7% |
| FCF Margin | 9.4% | 5.4% | 5.0% | 12.9% | — | — | 15.1% | 11.7% | 10.8% | 11.3% | 7.7% | 15.3% | 7.5% | 14.2% | 12.9% | 13.4% | +0.6pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.38 | $3.67 | $4.10 | $5.05 | $4.16 | $1.63 | $-1.24 | $-1.08 | $1.53 | $-7.32 | $-7.57 | $1.32 | $2.39 | $2.91 | $3.11 | $2.35 | -24.4% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
Schlumberger is attempting to decouple its financial performance from the raw cyclicality of oil prices by embedding AI and software into the heart of the energy value chain. By positioning itself as a "technology-agnostic" integrator, Schlumberger aims to dominate the "energy trilemma"—balancing security, affordability, and decarbonization—while using its century of subsurface expertise to expand into carbon capture and geothermal markets.
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
Schlumberger’s Global Scale and Local Presence (10-K Item 1) is a primary competitive advantage, but it is directly threatened by Geopolitical and Global Exposure because 82% of its 2025 revenue is generated outside the US (Risks). This geographic reach, which allows Schlumberger to deploy "fit-for-basin" technology, becomes a liability when trade sanctions or social unrest occur, specifically cited in Schlumberger’s concerns regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine (Risks).
Furthermore, Schlumberger’s Digital Integration strategy—which utilizes "agentic AI orchestration" and remote "Performance Live™" centers (Competitive Position)—is highly vulnerable to Cybersecurity Incidents. A breach of these digital platforms could lead to the loss of proprietary intellectual property or the disruption of remote wellsite operations, potentially negating the efficiency gains Schlumberger uses to differentiate itself from smaller, specialized firms (Risks).
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
The financial data reveals a company in transition: while revenue grew 5% to $9.75 billion in the fourth quarter of 2025, net income dropped 25% to $824 million (8-K). This divergence is largely explained by the acquisition of ChampionX, which contributed $879 million in revenue but likely introduced temporary integration costs or shifted the overall margin profile (8-K).
(XBRL) Schlumberger’s growth trajectory shows signs of stabilization; while TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter revenue growth is slightly negative at -1.6%, the most recent quarter's 5% growth suggests a reversal of that trend. This is bolstered by the Digital division, which grew 17% year-over-year, significantly outperforming the core Well Construction business, which saw a 10% decline (8-K). With a short interest of 4.1% of the float, market sentiment remains cautious but not aggressively bearish (Yahoo Finance). While Schlumberger’s 16.0% operating margin is healthy, it sits in the middle of the peer group, trailing higher-margin producers like Diamondback Energy (33.3%) but remaining far ahead of peers like Baker Hughes (3.4%).
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At a 14.5x Forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations, Schlumberger is trading exactly in line with the peer median (Yahoo Finance). According to the (CAPM analysis), the market is currently pricing in a long-term growth rate of ~1.5%.
This valuation appears justified by Schlumberger's fundamentals. The 1.5% implied growth rate is conservative when compared to the 17% growth in Digital services and the board's commitment to return $4 billion to shareholders in 2026 (8-K). However, investors are not getting a bargain; Schlumberger’s net debt of $9.6 billion represents 2.2x its annual free cash flow, a leverage profile that may cap further multiple expansion (CAPM analysis). If global growth accelerates to a GDP-pace of 2.5%, the sensitivity analysis suggests a justified multiple of 17.0x, offering roughly 17% upside from current levels.
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Cautious if international revenue (which grew 7% sequentially) begins to contract due to new trade sanctions or expropriation of assets in non-US markets (8-K/Risks).
- Constructive if the Digital division maintains its 17% growth rate while the Production Systems division (up 30%) continues to absorb ChampionX without further hits to net income (8-K).
- Cautious if free cash flow margins (currently 12.2%) compress, making the $9.6 billion debt load more difficult to service in a high-interest-rate environment (XBRL).
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: Schlumberger maintains a dominant position through its "fit-for-basin" global infrastructure and a proprietary digital ecosystem (Delfi™, Lumi™) that creates high switching costs for energy operators.
Bottom Line: Schlumberger is a fairly valued play on the digitalization of the oilfield, offering steady shareholder returns but remaining heavily exposed to global geopolitical instability.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Oil and Gas Price Volatility: Demand for Schlumberger’s services is tied to customer spending, which is highly sensitive to hydrocarbon price fluctuations. Downturns lead to project cancellations, payment delays, or nonpayment of amounts owed.
- Geopolitical and Global Exposure: With 82% of 2025 revenue generated outside the US, Schlumberger faces risks from trade sanctions, expropriation of assets, and social unrest. Schlumberger specifically cites the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the resulting sanctions as a source of operational and financial uncertainty.
- Cybersecurity Incidents: Schlumberger relies on digital technologies for remote wellsite operations and data management. Cyberattacks, including ransomware or social engineering, could result in the loss of intellectual property, breach of personal data, and disruption of customer businesses.
- Energy Transition: Failure to adapt to the global shift toward renewable energy or a perception that Schlumberger is not effectively implementing an energy transition strategy could limit access to capital and reduce demand for fossil fuel-related services.
- Competitive Technology Leadership: The energy industry is rapidly evolving. If Schlumberger fails to develop innovative technologies or deliver them in a cost-competitive manner, it risks losing market share and seeing its intellectual property become obsolete.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Russia Operations: As of December 31, 2025, Schlumberger held $0.7 billion in net assets in Russia, including $0.2 billion in cash and short-term investments and $0.4 billion in receivables. These assets are subject to ongoing international sanctions and potential further restrictions.
- ChampionX Acquisition: The realization of anticipated benefits and synergies from the ChampionX acquisition depends on the successful integration of the two businesses; failure to achieve these objectives could result in the acquisition failing to deliver expected value.
- Environmental Liability: Schlumberger faces "strict liability" for remediation costs related to hazardous substances, radioactive materials, and chemicals used in its operations, regardless of the degree of care taken.
- Well Incidents: Technical complexities in exploration and production environments expose Schlumberger to significant health, safety, and environmental risks, including blowouts or loss of containment, which may not be fully covered by insurance.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- Anti-Corruption and Trade Controls: Schlumberger is subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, and various international trade sanctions. Violations can lead to criminal sanctions, fines, and the loss of required licenses to operate in specific markets.
- Climate Change Regulation: International agreements like the Paris Agreement and the Europe Climate Law, along with national mandates to limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, may impose taxes on Schlumberger or its customers and accelerate the obsolescence of its products.
- Intellectual Property Litigation: Schlumberger faces the risk of third-party claims alleging that its methodologies or technologies infringe on existing patents. Such claims can result in significant legal costs, royalty payments, or the forced discontinuation of specific products or services.
4. Financial Impact Map
Oil and Gas Price Volatility → Revenue and Cash Flows → Historically results in reduced demand and lower expenditures by customers. Geopolitical Instability (Russia) → Net Assets → $0.7 billion carrying value as of December 31, 2025, subject to sanctions and potential repatriation restrictions. Cybersecurity Incidents → Operating Expenses → Increased costs for remediation, legal exposure, and potential fines. Energy Transition → Access to Capital → Potential for investors or financial institutions to shift funding away from fossil fuel-related industries. Environmental Liability → Cash Flows → Potential for material liabilities related to investigation, cleanup, and personal injury or property damage claims.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 14A | Feb 2026 | — |
| 8-K | Jan 2026 | — |
| 10-K | Jan 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| 10-Q | Oct 2025 | Sep 2025 |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
SLB expands NVIDIA partnership to develop AI infrastructure for energy sector operations
- ▸Expanded collaboration with NVIDIA to design and deploy energy-specific AI infrastructure
- ▸SLB to integrate NVIDIA DSX AI factory design into digital platforms
- ▸ChampionX integration targeting $400 million in cost synergies
- ▸Current share price $53.50 with 38.78% return over 90 days
- ▸Fair value estimated at $55.05 per analyst consensus
SLB shares rise 6% as Citigroup issues buy recommendation on oil infrastructure weakness
- ▸Citigroup recommends buying SLB stock on recent price weakness
- ▸SLB shares up 6% to over $47 following analyst note
- ▸Shell, ExxonMobil, and Occidental report infrastructure damage in Persian Gulf
- ▸SLB previously lowered Q1 earnings guidance by $0.06 to $0.09
- ▸Potential long-term growth seen in post-conflict infrastructure repair demand
SLB Q1 2026 revenue guidance lowered, EPS impact of 6–9 cents expected
- ▸Q1 2026 revenue expected to be lower than previous internal projections
- ▸Additional costs to impact Q1 2026 EPS by 6–9 cents
- ▸Bernstein raised price target to $56.10 from $52.30, maintained Outperform rating
- ▸Company cites global business resilience, specifically noting Middle East operations
- ▸Guidance update follows operational challenges impacting quarterly performance
SLB Increases Dividend and Announces Multibillion Dollar Shareholder Capital Return Program
- ▸Digital recurring revenue surpassed US$1B milestone
- ▸Secured integrated multi-well subsea contract from CNOOC for Kaiping 18-1 field
- ▸Announced multibillion dollar capital return program to shareholders
- ▸Shares trading ~16% below analyst consensus price target of US$55.40
- ▸Company valuation estimated at 40.5% below fair value
Aker Solutions proposes NOK 5.00 extraordinary dividend following SLB share sale
- ▸Proposed extraordinary dividend of NOK 5.00 per share
- ▸Total dividend payout approximately NOK 2.4 billion
- ▸Proceeds derived from sale of 5.057 million SLB shares at USD 50.43 average
- ▸Extraordinary dividend is in addition to proposed NOK 3.60 ordinary dividend
- ▸AGM approval required on April 16, 2026; payment date April 27, 2026
Aker Solutions proposes NOK 5.00 extraordinary dividend totaling NOK 2.4 billion
- ▸Extraordinary dividend of NOK 5.00 per share proposed
- ▸Total dividend payout equals NOK 2.4 billion
- ▸Dividend funded by sale of 5.05 million SLB shares at $50.43 average
- ▸Payment subject to April 16, 2026 Annual General Meeting approval
- ▸Extraordinary dividend is in addition to proposed NOK 3.60 ordinary dividend
SLB issues Q1 2026 negative earnings preannouncement citing Middle East operational disruptions
- ▸Q1 2026 negative earnings preannouncement issued due to Middle East geopolitical tensions
- ▸Operational activities suspended across multiple Middle East regional markets
- ▸OneSubsea unit to acquire Envirex Group AS subsea business
- ▸Stock trades at $44.72, approximately 19% below analyst consensus target of $55.47
- ▸30-day stock return declined 11.3% amid weak short-term sentiment
SLB warns of $0.06–$0.09 Q1 EPS hit from Middle East operational disruptions
- ▸Q1 EPS impact estimated at $0.06–$0.09 due to regional conflict
- ▸Strait of Hormuz blockade disrupting energy flows and logistics
- ▸Operations in Iraq, Qatar, and Kuwait most heavily impacted
- ▸Middle East accounts for approximately 15% of OFSE sector revenue
- ▸Morgan Stanley maintains Overweight rating despite short-term earnings headwinds
SLB Q1 2026 guidance misses expectations with $0.06–$0.09 EPS drag from costs
- ▸Q1 2026 revenue guidance falls short of previous expectations
- ▸Additional costs to reduce EPS by $0.06–$0.09
- ▸OneSubsea JV secured new deepwater EPC contract from PTTEP Sabah Oil
- ▸Third major deepwater award for OneSubsea in the last year
- ▸Long-term 2028 targets project $38.7B revenue and $4.9B earnings
SLB Q1 EPS hit by 6-9 cents due to Middle East operational disruptions
- ▸Q1 EPS impact of 6-9 cents due to Middle East operational disruptions
- ▸Q1 revenue expected to be lower than previous guidance
- ▸Operations demobilized in select countries to safeguard personnel and facilities
- ▸Travel and transit suspended across the Middle East region
- ▸Crisis response teams activated to monitor regional security and safety