SMCI
TechnologySupermicro
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2010–2025(16yr)| Metric | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.4M | $942.6M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $2.0B | $2.2B | $2.5B | $3.4B | $3.5B | $3.3B | $3.6B | $5.2B | $7.1B | $15.0B | $22.0B | +46.6% |
| Gross Profit | $115.0M | $151.1M | $165.4M | $160.1M | $225.5M | $320.2M | $331.5M | $350.0M | $430.0M | $495.5M | $526.2M | $534.5M | $800.0M | $1.3B | $2.1B | $2.4B | +17.9% |
| Gross Margin | 15.9% | 16.0% | 16.3% | 13.8% | 15.4% | 16.4% | 14.9% | 14.1% | 12.8% | 14.2% | 15.8% | 15.0% | 15.4% | 18.0% | 13.8% | 11.1% | -2.7pp |
| Operating Income | $40.7M | $58.7M | $46.0M | $27.2M | $80.3M | $146.7M | $106.8M | $94.9M | $94.7M | $97.2M | $85.7M | $123.9M | $335.2M | $761.1M | $1.2B | $1.3B | +3.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 6.2% | 4.5% | 2.3% | 5.5% | 7.5% | 4.8% | 3.8% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.6% | 3.5% | 6.5% | 10.7% | 8.1% | 5.7% | -2.4pp |
| Net Income | $26.9M | $40.2M | $29.9M | $21.3M | $54.2M | $101.9M | $72.0M | $66.9M | $46.2M | $71.9M | $84.3M | $111.9M | $285.2M | $640.0M | $1.2B | $1.0B | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.7% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 1.8% | 3.7% | 5.2% | 3.2% | 2.7% | 1.4% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 5.5% | 9.0% | 7.7% | 4.8% | -2.9pp |
| Free Cash Flow | -$24.4M | -$7.7M | -$8.4M | $8.6M | -$34.0M | -$79.7M | $73.4M | -$125.6M | $59.5M | $237.7M | -$74.7M | $64.9M | -$486.0M | $626.8M | -$2.6B | $1.5B | +158.7% |
| FCF Margin | -3.4% | -0.8% | -0.8% | 0.7% | -2.3% | -4.1% | 3.3% | -5.1% | 1.8% | 6.8% | -2.2% | 1.8% | -9.4% | 8.8% | -17.4% | 7.0% | +24.4pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.65 | $0.93 | $0.67 | $0.48 | $1.16 | $2.03 | $1.39 | $1.29 | $0.89 | $1.39 | $1.60 | $2.09 | $5.32 | $11.43 | $1.92 | $1.68 | -12.5% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
Supermicro has successfully transformed itself from a specialized hardware manufacturer into the essential "plumbing" provider for the AI era, yet it is outgrowing its own internal infrastructure. While it is winning the race to deploy Nvidia’s latest chips, its financial foundations are unstable, characterized by ineffective reporting controls and a business model that consumes more cash than it generates.
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
Supermicro’s "first-to-market" competitive advantage is directly threatened by its extreme supplier dependence. While Supermicro prides itself on being the first to launch platforms for Nvidia’s Blackwell and Hopper chips (10-K Item 1), one supplier accounted for a staggering 64.4% of all purchases in fiscal 2025. Any disruption at this single source would immediately nullify Supermicro’s speed-to-market edge.
Furthermore, Supermicro's "Total IT Solutions" strategy is being undermined by its internal control deficiencies. Management concluded that disclosure controls were ineffective as of June 2025 (10-K Item 1A). The resulting remediation efforts and legal proceedings from stockholder litigation divert management attention and capital at the exact moment Supermicro needs to scale its global manufacturing footprint to meet AI demand.
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
The financial data reveals a company trading profitability for sheer scale. In the most recent quarter, revenue surged 123.4% to $12.68 billion, yet cost of sales grew even faster at 137.3% (10-Q). This disconnect has left Supermicro with a gross margin of just 8.5%, the lowest among its peer group, and a negative free cash flow (FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders) margin of -2.4% (XBRL).
The divergence between the TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter revenue growth of 46.6% and the most recent quarterly growth of 123.4% is explained by a massive shift in product mix. AI GPU-related billings increased by $7.40 billion year-over-year, while sales in all other categories fell by 42.5% (10-Q). This pivot suggests Supermicro is no longer a diversified IT provider but a concentrated bet on high-volume, low-margin AI deployments. Market sentiment remains highly skeptical of this trajectory, evidenced by a significant short interest of 19.0% of the float (Yahoo Finance).
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At a forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations of 10.8x, Supermicro trades at a 6% discount to the peer median of 11.5x. According to the CAPM analysis, the market is currently pricing in a long-term growth rate of 3.5%. This valuation appears conservative given Supermicro's recent triple-digit sales growth, but it is justified by Supermicro's poor efficiency metrics.
Supermicro ranks last among its peers in both gross margin (8.5%) and FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders margin (-2.4%). While competitors like NetApp (NTAP) maintain a 14.6% FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders margin, Supermicro is currently burning cash to fund its growth. If growth were to slow to a GDP-pace of 2.5%, the justified multiple would fall to 9.8x, representing a 9% downside from current levels. The current "modest discount" to peers is a direct reflection of the risk that Supermicro may not be able to convert its massive AI billings into sustainable shareholder returns.
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Constructive if Supermicro successfully remediates its material weaknesses in financial reporting and reports a positive FCFFCFFree Cash Flow — cash left after paying for operations and capital investments; what the company can actually spend, save, or return to shareholders margin, signaling that the business can self-fund its expansion.
- Cautious if gross margins continue to compress below 8% as AI GPU volume increases, or if any of the four customers that represent over 10% of sales reduce their order volume.
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: Rapid time-to-market facilitated by a modular "Building Block" architecture and a significant U.S.-based manufacturing presence.
Bottom Line: Supermicro is a high-velocity growth engine built on a fragile operational chassis; it is a leading player in AI infrastructure, but its financial instability makes it a speculative holding.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Reporting and Internal Control Deficiencies: Supermicro concluded that its internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls were ineffective as of June 30, 2025, due to material weaknesses. Remediation efforts require significant internal and external resources, increasing operating expenses and diverting management attention.
- Customer Concentration: Supermicro has become increasingly dependent on a small number of large customers. In fiscal year 2025, four customers each accounted for 10% or more of net sales, compared to one customer in 2024 and none in 2023. The loss of any of these key customers could materially reduce revenue.
- Supply Chain and Component Volatility: Supermicro relies on a limited number of suppliers for essential components, including GPUs, CPUs, and memory. Two suppliers accounted for 64.4% and 5.1% of total purchases in fiscal year 2025. Volatility in the availability and pricing of these components directly impacts the cost of sales and the ability to meet customer demand.
- Legal and Regulatory Exposure: Supermicro is subject to various lawsuits, including stockholder derivative and class action litigation, as well as potential government inquiries. These proceedings could result in substantial costs, damage awards, or requirements to change business practices.
- Indebtedness and Capital Requirements: As of June 30, 2025, Supermicro had approximately $4.8 billion in consolidated indebtedness, including various convertible notes. This debt limits cash flow available for operations and imposes restrictive covenants that could hinder Supermicro’s ability to raise additional capital or pursue growth strategies.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Related Party Conflicts: Supermicro maintains significant business relationships with Ablecom and Compuware, which are controlled by family members of Supermicro’s CEO and other executives. These relationships may not be conducted on arms-length terms, and Supermicro may be disadvantaged by the conflicting economic interests of its leadership.
- Key Person Dependency: Supermicro is highly dependent on the continued service of its co-founder and CEO, Charles Liang. There is currently no succession plan in place for his replacement, and his departure could disrupt the implementation of Supermicro’s business strategy.
- Inventory Management: Due to the difficulty of predicting demand in the AI and server markets, Supermicro faces the risk of holding excess or obsolete inventory, which would reduce gross margins. Conversely, underestimating demand leads to lost revenue opportunities and potential loss of market share.
- AI Market Uncertainty: A portion of recent success is tied to the AI industry, which is subject to evolving regulatory constraints and ethical considerations. If the AI market declines or changes, Supermicro’s results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- Export Controls: Supermicro is subject to complex and rapidly changing U.S. and international trade regulations, particularly regarding high-performance computing and AI-related products. Recent U.S. export control revisions in January 2025 impose worldwide authorization requirements and per-country limits on advanced computing products, which could disadvantage Supermicro against competitors and limit its ability to serve customer demand.
- Data Privacy Laws: Supermicro is subject to evolving global privacy legislation, including the GDPR, CCPA, and CPRA. Non-compliance can result in significant penalties, such as fines up to 4% of annual global revenue under the GDPR, and may require fundamental changes to business practices.
- Anti-Corruption Compliance: Supermicro is subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other anti-bribery laws. Any violation by employees or agents could lead to severe fines, profit disgorgement, and bans on transacting government business.
4. Financial Impact Map
- Material Weaknesses in Internal Controls → Operating Expenses → Significant incremental fees for accounting, financial, and consulting services.
- Customer Concentration → Net Sales → Potential for substantial revenue decline if key customers reduce purchases or experience financial difficulties.
- Component Price Volatility → Cost of Sales → Increased cost of goods sold and potential for inventory obsolescence charges.
- Indebtedness and Convertible Notes → Cash Flow from Operations → Dedication of cash flow to service debt and interest payments, limiting funds for other business purposes.
- Export Control Restrictions → Net Sales → Potential exclusion from specific geographic markets and inability to fulfill customer demand for advanced computing products.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 14A | Mar 2026 | — |
| 10-Q | Feb 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| 8-K | Feb 2026 | — |
| 10-K | Aug 2025 | Jun 2025 |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
Supermicro CEO denies broader company involvement in $2.5B illegal China export scheme
- ▸CEO claims no employees beyond three indicted individuals involved in smuggling
- ▸Company does not currently anticipate need to restate financial earnings
- ▸Internal board-led investigation into export control violations remains ongoing
- ▸DOJ alleges $2.5B in servers with Nvidia GPUs smuggled to China
- ▸Stock rose 18% in after-hours trading following management commentary
Super Micro Q3 Revenue $10.2B +123% YoY, Addresses DOJ Indictment Concerns
- ▸Q3 revenue $10.2B, up 123% YoY but down 19% sequentially
- ▸AI GPU-related platforms accounted for over 80% of total revenue
- ▸Sequential revenue decline attributed to customer site readiness and supply chain constraints
- ▸Company confirms it is not a defendant or target in DOJ indictment
- ▸Independent investigation finds no company involvement beyond named individuals
SMCI Q1 Revenue $10.24B Misses Estimates, But EPS $0.84 Beats by 34.5%
- ▸Q1 revenue $10.24B, +123% YoY, missed estimates of $12.38B
- ▸Non-GAAP EPS $0.84, beat consensus estimates of $0.62 by 34.5%
- ▸Q2 revenue guidance $11.75B midpoint, exceeds analyst estimates of $10.92B
- ▸Adjusted EBITDA $814.3M, beat analyst estimates of $571.9M by 42.4%
- ▸Free cash flow -$6.70B, down from $594.1M in prior year period
Super Micro Q4 revenue forecast $11B–$12.5B beats $11.07B analyst estimate
- ▸Q4 revenue guidance $11B–$12.5B exceeds $11.07B consensus
- ▸Strong demand for AI-optimized server hardware driving growth
- ▸Shares rose 11% in extended trading following announcement
- ▸Company remains primary beneficiary of AI data center infrastructure spending
- ▸Guidance reflects rapid scaling of high-performance server production
Super Micro Shares Slide 65% From July Peak Following Co-Founder Indictment
- ▸Co-founder Yih-Shyan Wally Liaw indicted for circumventing US export restrictions to China
- ▸Liaw resigned from position following indictment
- ▸Shares down 65% from late-July peak, currently trading near $21
- ▸Company cooperating with authorities; CEO Charles Liang not named as defendant
- ▸Fiscal 2026 revenue projected to exceed $40 billion despite governance concerns
Super Micro Raises FY26 Revenue Guidance to $40B Amid Strong AI Infrastructure Demand
- ▸Raised FY26 revenue guidance to at least $40B from $33B
- ▸Last quarter revenue $12.68B, +123.36% YoY, beat $10.34B estimate
- ▸Last quarter non-GAAP EPS $0.69, beat $0.49 estimate
- ▸Company faces multiple securities class action lawsuits regarding export control compliance
- ▸DOJ indicted three individuals for illegal export of servers containing NVIDIA chips
SMCI AI GPU Platforms Drive 90% of Revenue; FY26 Revenue Target $40B
- ▸AI GPU platforms now account for 90% of total revenue
- ▸Q2 FY26 OEM and data center revenue reached $10.7B, 84% of total
- ▸Single customer concentration accounted for 63% of Q2 FY26 revenue
- ▸Inventory levels surged to $10.6B in Q2 FY26
- ▸Company maintains $40B revenue target for fiscal 2026
Bank of America cuts SMCI price target to $24 from $34 citing export control probe
- ▸Bank of America downgraded SMCI to Underperform, price target cut to $24
- ▸Three individuals indicted for conspiring to sell restricted GPUs to China
- ▸Two employees on administrative leave, one contractor terminated following investigation
- ▸Risk of supplier component tightening and potential loss of customer contracts
- ▸Margin pressure expected from increased compliance costs and competitive headwinds
SMCI Co-founder Charged in $2.5B Illegal Nvidia Chip Export Scheme to China
- ▸Co-founder Yih-Shyan Liaw charged with smuggling $2.5B in Nvidia AI chips to China
- ▸Market value dropped $6.1B in a single session following indictment
- ▸Shareholder class action filed alleging securities fraud and export law violations
- ▸Co-founder Liaw resigned from board following federal criminal charges
- ▸Gross margin compressed from 15% to 6.3% in most recent quarter
SMCI shares drop 7% on new shareholder lawsuit alleging export control violations
- ▸New class-action lawsuit alleges undisclosed violations of U.S. China export control laws
- ▸Co-founder Wally Liaw faces federal charges in $2.5B AI chip smuggling ring
- ▸Q2 FY2026 revenue $12.68B, +123.4% YoY, beating estimates by 22%
- ▸FY2026 revenue guidance raised to $40B projection
- ▸Northland Capital downgraded stock to Market Perform, slashed price target to $22