TSLA
CyclicalTesla, Inc.
Price Chart
Market Data
Financials
XBRL · SEC EDGAR2009–2025(17yr)| Metric | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025Latest | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $111.9M | $116.7M | $204.2M | $413.3M | $2.0B | $3.2B | $4.0B | $7.0B | $11.8B | $21.5B | $24.6B | $31.5B | $53.8B | $81.5B | $96.8B | $97.7B | $94.8B | -2.9% |
| Gross Profit | $9.5M | $30.7M | $61.6M | $30.1M | $456.3M | $881.7M | $923.5M | $1.6B | $2.2B | $4.0B | $4.1B | $6.6B | $13.6B | $20.9B | $17.7B | $17.4B | $17.1B | -2.0% |
| Gross Margin | 8.5% | 26.3% | 30.2% | 7.3% | 22.7% | 27.6% | 22.8% | 22.8% | 18.9% | 18.8% | 16.6% | 21.0% | 25.3% | 25.6% | 18.2% | 17.9% | 18.0% | +0.2pp |
| Operating Income | -$51.9M | -$146.8M | -$251.5M | -$394.3M | -$61.3M | -$186.7M | -$716.6M | -$667.3M | -$1.6B | -$388.1M | -$69.0M | $2.0B | $6.5B | $13.7B | $8.9B | $7.1B | $4.4B | -38.5% |
| Operating Margin | -46.4% | -125.8% | -123.1% | -95.4% | -3.0% | -5.8% | -17.7% | -9.5% | -13.9% | -1.8% | -0.3% | 6.3% | 12.1% | 16.8% | 9.2% | 7.2% | 4.6% | -2.7pp |
| Net Income | -$55.7M | -$154.3M | -$254.4M | -$396.2M | -$74.0M | -$294.0M | -$888.7M | -$674.9M | -$2.0B | -$976.1M | -$862.0M | $721.0M | $5.5B | $12.6B | $15.0B | $7.1B | $3.8B | -46.5% |
| Net Margin | -49.8% | -132.2% | -124.6% | -95.9% | -3.7% | -9.2% | -22.0% | -9.6% | -16.7% | -4.5% | -3.5% | 2.3% | 10.3% | 15.4% | 15.5% | 7.3% | 4.0% | -3.3pp |
| Free Cash Flow | -$92.7M | -$168.0M | -$312.3M | -$505.3M | -$6.2M | — | — | -$1.4B | -$3.5B | -$2.9M | $1.1B | $2.8B | $5.0B | $7.6B | $4.4B | $3.6B | $6.2B | +73.5% |
| FCF Margin | -82.8% | -143.9% | -152.9% | -122.3% | -0.3% | — | — | -20.1% | -29.6% | -0.0% | 4.4% | 8.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 4.5% | 3.7% | 6.6% | +2.9pp |
| EPS (Diluted) | — | $-1.63 | $-2.43 | $-3.47 | $-0.60 | $-2.34 | $-6.93 | $-4.68 | $-11.83 | $-5.72 | $-4.92 | $0.64 | $4.90 | $3.62 | $4.30 | $2.04 | $1.08 | -47.1% |
1. THE BIG PICTURE
Tesla is currently a business in tension, attempting to outrun the stagnation of its core automotive segment by reinventing itself as a robotics and AI powerhouse. While management characterizes the recent 11% drop in automotive revenue as part of a "critical year" of transition, Tesla, Inc.’s survival as a growth stock now depends entirely on its ability to monetize software and autonomous platforms like Robotaxi and FSD (8-K).
2. WHERE THE RISKS HIT HARDEST
Tesla’s "vertically integrated business model" and "engineering expertise" are directly threatened by "production and ramp delays" for new products like the Cybercab and Optimus (10-K Item 1). If Tesla fails to achieve the necessary design tolerances or manufacturing output rates, it will likely miss the profitability targets required to fund its expensive AI infrastructure (10-K Item 1A). Furthermore, Tesla, Inc.’s "proprietary battery cell" advantage is vulnerable to "volatile raw material prices" and a reliance on a "limited number of suppliers" such as Panasonic and CATL, which creates a structural bottleneck for the very energy and vehicle products intended to drive future growth (10-K Item 1, 10-K Item 1A).
3. WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY TOGETHER
The financial data reveals a stark divergence between Tesla’s narrative and its current results. While management emphasizes a shift toward AI, Tesla, Inc.’s total revenues fell 3% in the fourth quarter of 2025, and net income plummeted 61% to $840 million (8-K). This contraction is driven by the 11% decline in automotive revenue, which is only partially offset by 25% growth in energy generation and 18% growth in services (8-K).
Despite this revenue pressure, Tesla maintains industry-leading efficiency, with an 18.0% gross margin and a 6.0% operating margin that both outperform peers GM and Ford (XBRL). However, the negative 2.9% TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter revenue growth suggests that Tesla’s current product cycle is maturing faster than its AI initiatives can scale. With short interest at a low 1.9% of the float, there is little evidence of a "short squeeze" dynamic; rather, the stock’s performance relies on the market’s continued willingness to overlook current earnings contraction in favor of future robotics potential.
4. IS IT WORTH IT AT THIS PRICE?
At a forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations of 142.5x, the market is pricing in ~14.4% long-term growth (CAPM analysis). This represents a 2,026% premium to the peer median forward P/EP/EPrice-to-Earnings ratio — share price divided by annual earnings per share; how much investors pay per dollar of profit. Higher P/E = higher growth expectations of 6.7x. For this valuation to be justified, Tesla must successfully transition from a car manufacturer to a high-margin software and service provider. The current fundamentals challenge this: TTMTTMTrailing Twelve Months — the most recent full year of financial data, updated on a rolling basis each quarter revenue growth is negative (-2.9%), and Tesla, Inc.’s net margin of 5.4%—while better than GM’s 4.8%—does not yet reflect the profile of a high-growth AI firm (XBRL). If long-term growth expectations were to moderate to 12%, the justified multiple would fall to 32.3x, implying significant downside from current levels (CAPM analysis). The biggest risk to this price is the "key-person risk" associated with Elon Musk, whose involvement in multiple ventures could disrupt the focus needed to execute this complex pivot (10-K Item 1A).
5. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS VIEW?
- Constructive if the removal of safety monitors from Robotaxis in Austin moves beyond "limited" testing to a wide-scale commercial rollout, proving the viability of the service-driven business model (8-K).
- Cautious if the planned 2026 production start for the Optimus robot or Megapack 3 at Megafactory Houston faces delays, signaling that the "physical AI" transition is stalling (8-K).
- Cautious if automotive revenue continues to decline at double-digit rates before energy and AI services contribute a majority of total gross profit.
6. BOTTOM LINE
Structural Advantage: A vertically integrated ecosystem combining proprietary AI inference chips, in-house battery chemistry, and a global fleet of vehicles that provides a massive real-world data set for neural network training.
Bottom Line: Tesla is an AI venture capital portfolio disguised as a car company, and its current valuation requires a near-flawless execution of its autonomous robotics strategy to justify its massive premium over traditional automakers.
1. Top 5 Material Risks
- Production and Ramp Delays: Tesla, Inc. faces risks in scaling new products, specifically driver assistance systems, autonomous driving solutions, and mass-market vehicles like the Cybercab. Failure to achieve design tolerances, high quality, and output rates at manufacturing facilities could prevent Tesla, Inc. from meeting cost and profitability targets.
- Supply Chain and Component Shortages: Tesla, Inc. relies on hundreds of global suppliers, including single-source providers. Disruptions—ranging from trade policy changes and tariffs to cyberattacks and insolvency—could lead to idle manufacturing facilities, increased costs, and an inability to fulfill customer contracts.
- Manufacturing Facility Construction: The ability to increase production is dependent on the successful construction and ramp of new factories. Uncertainties regarding regulatory compliance, permitting, and the ability to hire and train qualified employees could harm Tesla, Inc.’s financial condition and operating results.
- Battery Supply and Cost: Tesla, Inc. requires substantially more lithium-ion battery cells to grow. Dependence on a limited number of suppliers (Panasonic and CATL) and the volatility of raw material prices (lithium, nickel) threaten Tesla, Inc.’s ability to control costs and maintain profitability.
- Market Demand and Competition: The automotive market is highly competitive, and demand for electric vehicles is subject to macroeconomic conditions, such as rising interest rates, which may cause consumers to pull back spending. Failure to maintain demand for vehicles or autonomous solutions could harm financial results.
2. Company-Specific Risks
- Key Person Dependency: Tesla, Inc. is highly dependent on the services of Elon Musk, who does not devote his full time and attention to Tesla, Inc., as he holds management positions at other ventures including Space Exploration Technologies Corp., xAI, and Neuralink Corp.
- Product Liability and Self-Insurance: In most jurisdictions, Tesla, Inc. generally self-insures against product liability claims for vehicle exposure, meaning claims are paid from company funds rather than insurance, potentially impacting cash flows.
- Residual Value Guarantees: Tesla, Inc. provides residual value guarantees to customers and partners for certain financing programs; if actual resale values are lower than guaranteed amounts, Tesla, Inc.’s financial condition may be harmed.
- 2025 CEO Performance Award Misalignment: There is a risk that the product goals associated with the 2025 CEO Performance Award may be misaligned with consumer demand, potentially leading to strategic misalignment or write-downs of related assets.
3. Regulatory/Legal Risks
- Trade Policy and Tariffs: U.S. trade policy alterations in 2025, including heightened import tariffs and retaliatory measures, have impacted supply chain costs and may affect the availability of certain technologies or components.
- Direct-to-Consumer Sales Restrictions: Laws in certain U.S. states may be interpreted to limit Tesla, Inc.’s ability to sell vehicles directly to consumers, potentially restricting Tesla, Inc.’s most effective sales strategy.
- Data Privacy and Cybersecurity: Tesla, Inc. is subject to complex and evolving privacy laws, such as the GDPR in the EU and the California Consumer Privacy Act, which impose significant compliance costs and potential penalties for noncompliance.
- Government Investigations: Tesla, Inc. is cooperating with ongoing government investigations; while no wrongdoing has been concluded, Tesla, Inc. could be subject to liability, penalties, or restrictive sanctions if legal action is pursued by the SEC, the U.S. Department of Justice, or other agencies.
4. Financial Impact Map
Production and Ramp Delays → Profitability Targets → Failure to meet cost and profitability targets for new products like Cybercab. Supply Chain and Component Shortages → Cost of Revenue → Increased costs due to component shortages, tariffs, and the need to search for new suppliers. Battery Supply and Cost → Profitability → Reduced profitability if raw material price increases cannot be recouped through higher vehicle prices. Market Demand and Competition → Revenue → Lower vehicle unit sales, price reductions, and revenue shortfalls resulting from increased competition and macroeconomic volatility. Product Liability and Self-Insurance → Cash Flows → Potential for substantial monetary damages and legal defense costs to be paid from company funds rather than insurance.
Recent Filings
| Form | Filed | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 10-K | Jan 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| 8-K | Jan 2026 | — |
| 10-Q | Oct 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| 14A | Sep 2025 | — |
AI-extracted key facts from press releases and SEC filings. Significance 1–10.
Tesla Q1 Deliveries 358,023, Up 6% YoY Despite Tax Credit Expiration
- ▸Q1 deliveries 358,023, up 6% year-over-year
- ▸Q1 production 408,383 vehicles
- ▸Sales growth sustained despite expiration of $7,500 federal EV tax credit
- ▸Market share recovery expected as legacy automakers exit EV segment
- ▸US market share previously declined to 50% late last year
Tesla Q1 deliveries 358,000 miss estimates of 372,000; Q4 net income -64% YoY
- ▸Q1 2026 vehicle deliveries 358,000, missing 372,000 estimate
- ▸Q4 2025 net income $840M, down 64% year-over-year
- ▸Q4 2025 operating expenses +39% year-over-year on AI and R&D investment
- ▸Full-year 2025 automotive revenue declined 10%
- ▸Total 2025 revenue $94.83B, down 3% year-over-year
Tesla Q1 Deliveries 360,000 Miss Estimates; Energy Storage Deployments Drop to 8.8 GWh
- ▸Q1 vehicle deliveries totaled approximately 360,000 units
- ▸Energy storage deployments fell to 8.8 GWh from 14.2 GWh in Q4
- ▸Energy storage volume hit lowest level since Q3 2024
- ▸Stock declined 4.2% following delivery update
- ▸Q1 earnings conference call scheduled for April 22
Tesla Q1 deliveries 358,023 miss estimates of 370,000, down 14% sequentially
- ▸Q1 vehicle deliveries 358,023 vs 370,000 expected
- ▸Q1 vehicle production 408,386 units
- ▸Energy storage deployments reached 8.8 gigawatt-hours
- ▸Model 3 and Y accounted for 341,893 deliveries
- ▸Deliveries down 14% compared to prior quarter
Tesla Energy segment emerges as primary cash generator for AI and robotics investments
- ▸Energy business fastest-growing segment by volume, revenue, and gross margins in 2025
- ▸Megapack grid-scale battery systems achieve 30% gross margins
- ▸Autobidder platform uses machine learning for autonomous wholesale power market trading
- ▸Combined Lathrop and Shanghai megafactory capacity reaches 80 GWh per year
- ▸New Brookshire, Texas facility targeting Megapack production in 2026
SpaceX files confidentially for IPO targeting $75 billion raise, $1.75 trillion valuation
- ▸Confidential IPO filing submitted to SEC targeting June listing
- ▸Targeting up to $75 billion in capital raise
- ▸Company valuation projected to reach $1.75 trillion
- ▸Considering dual-class share structure for insider voting control
- ▸Retail investor allocation expected to exceed 20% of offering
Tesla FY2025 revenue $94.83B down 2.9%, net income drops 46.8% amid AI spending
- ▸FY2025 revenue $94.83B, down 2.93% YoY
- ▸Full-year net income declined 46.79% YoY
- ▸Q4 vehicle deliveries fell 16% YoY
- ▸Operating expenses surged 39% YoY due to AI and robotics investment
- ▸Active FSD subscriptions reached 1.1 million, up 38% YoY
SpaceX files confidentially for IPO, targeting potential $75 billion offering in June
- ▸SpaceX filed confidential IPO paperwork with the SEC
- ▸Targeting potential June listing with up to $75B offering
- ▸Company valuation estimated between $1.25 trillion and $1.5 trillion
- ▸Retail investors may receive up to 20% allocation of offering
- ▸IPO proceeds to fund orbital data centers and Terafab semiconductor production
SpaceX files for confidential IPO, potential valuation exceeds $1.75 trillion
- ▸Confidential IPO filing submitted for potential record-breaking listing
- ▸Targeting capital raise exceeding $50 billion
- ▸Implied valuation estimated at over $1.75 trillion
- ▸Growth driven by reusable rocket technology and Starlink satellite network
- ▸Merger with xAI valued combined entity at $1.25 trillion
Tesla Q1 deliveries expected at 368,900 units, 11.8% sequential decline
- ▸Q1 delivery estimates 368,900 units, down 11.8% sequentially
- ▸Q1 delivery estimates up 9.6% year-over-year
- ▸FY24 delivery estimates average 1.7 million units
- ▸Demand pressured by competition in China and Europe
- ▸U.S. federal tax credit expiry weighing on EV purchase demand